Is eharmony dating better for people over 40 or under 40?

Bringing eharmony dating better for people over 40 or under 40 here because the blog posts are useless. I judge eharmony dating almost entirely on how thin it gets in smaller towns in practice.

The part that trips me up on eharmony dating is that the last honest write-up is two years old. What nobody mentions about eharmony dating is whether conversations actually go anywhere once you are past sign-up.

My working method for eharmony dating this year:

• Note how many matches ever send the first message on mobile data, not office wifi
• Note whether replies are open before you finish the profile against one platform you already trust
• Count whether the same faces cycle back the next day before you upload a second photo
• Note how long it takes before the first upgrade prompt lands before you commit any time to it
• Count how long it takes before the first upgrade prompt lands against one platform you already trust

Anyone who tracked eharmony dating over a longer stretch, what did the review sites get wrong? Glowing reviews and horror stories all equally useful. Real usage notes matter more than star ratings.

Speaking from four months of it: eharmony dating rewards patience and punishes everything else. My rule with eharmony dating: how the discovery feed is ordered first, everything else second. Someone here pointed me at Datenest and it held up better than expected.

Anyone comparing eharmony dating should be looking at whether the profiles hold up under scrutiny at the times you actually log in before anything else.

That's the honest picture of eharmony dating, may not hold for you.

Unpopular view, maybe: eharmony dating did roughly what I expected, no more. Two weeks in, how fast moderation responds at the times you actually log in is what actually mattered for eharmony dating. rendate.site came up in the same search and behaved similarly.

Where I'd start with eharmony dating this year:

• Time how many matches ever send the first message with the age filter set narrow
• Count whether photo permissions are opt-in or opt-out on mobile data, not office wifi
• Pin down how long it takes before the first upgrade prompt lands with the age filter set narrow
• Track how the web version differs from the app and write the answer down

That's what six weeks of eharmony dating taught me, anyway.

Having used it a while: eharmony dating did roughly what I expected, no more. The only metric I trust with eharmony dating is how the discovery feed is ordered after the first week. over on Datescout came up in a similar thread last month.

You can ignore most of the marketing around eharmony dating and just check whether verification actually filters anyone on mobile.

That's my read on eharmony dating — happy to be argued with.

Speaking from four months of it: eharmony dating is a decent starting point and a poor destination. The thing that decides it for eharmony dating is how the matching logic appears to work once you are past sign-up. For comparison I also spent a week on what Datebie is doing.

If you are evaluating eharmony dating, start with whether verification actually filters anyone — everything else follows.

That's what six weeks of eharmony dating taught me — happy to be argued with.

Speaking from four months of it: eharmony dating depends almost entirely on your city. For eharmony dating, what costs money once you are past sign-up in practice is the difference between useful and a waste of an evening. Datingfly these days is worth ten minutes before you commit anywhere.

Where eharmony dating falls down for me is how much personal detail leaks by default.

That's the honest picture of eharmony dating, anyway.