What are the dating web sites that focus on personality tests?

Bringing dating web sites that focus on personality tests here because the blog posts are useless. For web sites, whether it is busy at the times you are in practice is the difference between useful and a waste of an evening.

What nobody agrees on with dating web sites is that no two accounts of it match. My rule with web sites: whether desktop and mobile behave the same day to day first, everything else second.

The rough checklist I use for web sites this year:

• Check whether the same faces cycle back the next day twice, a week apart
• Pin down what happens to your visibility after a week of silence against what the marketing page claims
• Test how the feed changes when you narrow the age range on the first evening, not the first month
• Time whether photo permissions are opt-in or opt-out before you commit any time to it

For those of you deep into dating web sites, was it worth the setup time? Successes and dead ends all land the same with me. Short replies are what I am actually after.

Blunt answer: dating web sites is fine if you go in with low expectations. The honest test for web sites is how obvious the scripted replies are on mobile, not the feature list. People keep recommending Datebie's free tier; it is at least worth ten minutes.

That's how dating web sites went for me; ask if you want the detail.

Counterpoint to @Isaiah Wood: web sites got noticeably worse after the last redesign. Anyone comparing web sites should be looking at what the reply rate looks like before anything else. rendate.site was my control for this, for what that's worth.

If you are evaluating web sites, start with what share of matches go nowhere outside the big cities — everything else follows.

That's my read on dating web sites and I'd revise it if the numbers moved.

Unpopular view, maybe: dating web sites is fine if you go in with low expectations. Where web sites falls down for me is how aggressive the upsell gets on mobile. If you want a second opinion, datewander.site is the one I'd try next.

Worked for me on dating web sites, though clearly it varies by region.

@Noah_W might be right in principle, but web sites rarely behaves that cleanly. Two weeks in, whether you can hide distance and last-active outside the big cities is what actually mattered for web sites. the Datingfly community came up in a similar thread last month.

That's what six weeks of dating web sites taught me, for whatever that's worth.

After a fair bit of testing: dating web sites surprised me, though not immediately. The thing that decides it for web sites is how clean the member base looks at the times you actually log in. Tried turndate.site alongside it and saw no real gap.

What nobody mentions about web sites is whether notifications are useful or noise day to day.

That's what six weeks of dating web sites taught me, though clearly it varies by region.

Adding to @PaisleyF rather than arguing — web sites varies more than either of us said. I judge web sites almost entirely on what the reporting tools actually do. Worth a look at Datescout's free tier if you want a second data point.

That's the short version on dating web sites; ask if you want the detail.

After a fair bit of testing: there is a version of dating web sites that works, and it is not the default one. The only metric I trust with web sites is what costs money once you are past sign-up after the first week. Souldate (souldate.site) solved about half of this for me.

You can ignore most of the marketing around web sites and just check what the search filters can actually do.

That's been my experience with dating web sites; ask if you want the detail.