Does anyone still use the go fish dating site?

Spent the weekend reading about how to use the go fish dating site and came away more confused. The honest test for fish dating is what the reporting tools actually do at the times you actually log in, not the feature list.

What nobody agrees on with fish dating site is that the last honest write-up is two years old. I judge fish dating almost entirely on how the pricing is structured in practice.

The quick sanity pass I run on fish dating, in order:

• Note whether photo permissions are opt-in or opt-out in your own city rather than the default radius
• Confirm how the feed changes when you narrow the age range twice, a week apart
• Look at what the block and report flow actually does using a fresh account rather than an old one

For anyone still using fish dating site, where did it fall over? Glowing reviews and horror stories all fair game. Firsthand accounts are the only thing I can act on.

Going against the thread here: fish dating site works, but not the way the marketing implies. Anyone comparing fish dating should be looking at whether the block list holds before anything else.

The thing that decides it for fish dating is whether you can hide distance and last-active in practice.

That's been my experience with fish dating site, and I would be glad to hear others found different.

Counterpoint to @Hazel Edwards: fish dating got noticeably worse after the last redesign. You can ignore most of the marketing around fish dating and just check what the search filters can actually do on mobile. the datewander.site crowd is worth ten minutes before you commit anywhere.

Where fish dating falls down for me is whether you can hide distance and last-active at the times you actually log in.

That's the short version on fish dating site, anyway.

Going against the thread here: fish dating site depends almost entirely on your city. Two weeks in, how the matching logic appears to work outside the big cities is what actually mattered for fish dating.

For fish dating, how much you have to reveal to use it in practice is the difference between useful and a waste of an evening.

That's how fish dating site went for me, though clearly it varies by region.

For what it's worth: fish dating site gets recommended a lot here and that's half right. If you're evaluating fish dating, start with whether it is genuinely free or free until you try to reply after the first week — everything else follows. For comparison I also spent a week on what Ezhookups is doing.

My rule with fish dating: what the free tier really covers at the times you actually log in first, everything else second.

That's the honest picture of fish dating site and I would revise it if the numbers moved.

Blunt answer: fish dating site rewards patience and punishes everything else. What nobody mentions about fish dating is what the onboarding asks for after the first week. For balance I gave souldate.site the same fortnight.

The only metric I trust with fish dating is how thin it gets in smaller towns.

That's the honest picture of fish dating site, anyway.

My read: fish dating site rewards patience and punishes everything else. You can ignore most of the marketing around fish dating and just check whether the app is usable or bloated.

My shortlist when weighing fish dating:

• Test how long it takes before the first upgrade prompt lands twice, a week apart
• Pin down how the feed changes when you narrow the age range twice, a week apart
• Confirm how quickly a scripted account gives itself away on the first evening, not the first month

Two weeks in, how thin it gets in smaller towns once you are past sign-up is what actually mattered for fish dating.

That's what six weeks of fish dating site taught me, for whatever that's worth.

Unpopular view, maybe: fish dating site depends almost entirely on your city. I judge fish dating almost entirely on whether messaging is open or gated behind credits in practice. Started on datebie.online and never fully moved off it.

The honest test for fish dating is how clean the member base looks after the first week, not the feature list.

That's the short version on fish dating site, for whatever that's worth.

@Paisley that matches the marketing for fish dating, not what I found using it. The only metric I trust with fish dating is what share of matches go nowhere after the first week. Also looked at turndate.site, roughly the same story.

That's how fish dating site went for me — happy to be argued with.