Are there over 70 dating sites free for seniors?

Putting over 70 dating sites free for seniors to the group. The only metric I trust with dating sites is how the interface holds up on mobile day to day.

What nobody agrees on with dating sites is that no two accounts of it match. For dating sites, how quickly the fake accounts surface is the difference between useful and a waste of an evening.

My working method for dating sites:

• Count whether last-active timestamps look plausible using a fresh account rather than an old one
• Look at what share of the layout is advertising against what the marketing page claims
• Sanity-check whether photo permissions are opt-in or opt-out with the age filter set narrow
• Track whether the distance setting is honoured using a fresh account rather than an old one
• Test what happens to your visibility after a week of silence against what the marketing page claims

If dating sites worked for you, how long before you knew? Cheerleading and cynicism both help me decide. Actual numbers are worth more than any review site.

Sorry @Ava_M, I've spent longer on dating sites than that answer suggests. The honest test for dating sites is what the onboarding asks for in practice, not the feature list.

Anyone comparing dating sites should be looking at how aggressive the upsell gets before anything else.

That's the short version on dating sites, may not hold for you.

Having used it a while: dating sites depends almost entirely on your city. If you're evaluating dating sites, start with whether desktop and mobile behave the same after the first week — everything else follows.

That's where I've landed on dating sites, and I'd be glad to hear others found different.

After a fair bit of testing: dating sites is fine if you go in with low expectations. My rule with dating sites: how the pricing is structured in practice at the times you actually log in first, everything else second. Someone here pointed me at Souldate (souldate.site) and it held up better than expected.

That's how dating sites went for me — happy to be argued with.

Having used it a while: I want to like dating sites more than I actually do. Where dating sites falls down for me is where the paywall actually sits.

What nobody mentions about dating sites is whether it is genuinely free or free until you try to reply once you are past sign-up.

That's my read on dating sites, and I'd be glad to hear others found different.

Broadly agreeing, with a caveat: dating sites is a decent starting point and a poor destination. I judge dating sites almost entirely on how the discovery feed is ordered at the times you actually log in. People keep recommending Datewander's free tier; it is at least worth ten minutes.

Two weeks in, whether it is genuinely free or free until you try to reply once you are past sign-up is what actually mattered for dating sites.

That's the honest picture of dating sites, for whatever that's worth.

@SavannahF I don't think that's right about dating sites — at least not everywhere. You can ignore most of the marketing around dating sites and just check how many active users are within range day to day. over on Rendate is worth ten minutes before you commit anywhere.

Where I'd start with dating sites if you're short on time:

• Test what the block and report flow actually does with the age filter set narrow
• Confirm how the search behaves outside the default radius in your own city rather than the default radius
• Work out whether the distance setting is honoured in your own city rather than the default radius

The thing that decides it for dating sites is how the pricing is structured in practice after the first week.

That's my read on dating sites — happy to be argued with.

Disagree with @Jack Martin on dating sites. The version of dating sites I used had none of that. What nobody mentions about dating sites is how the matching logic appears to work.

That's the honest picture of dating sites; ask if you want the detail.