Where can I find a good free video dating sites platform?

Third time I have tried to get a straight answer on how to find a good free video dating sites platform. The thing that decides it for video dating sites is whether you can hide distance and last-active at the times you actually log in.

My problem with every answer on video dating sites is that the answers split by city and by year, so I would rather ask people than read another list. You can ignore most of the marketing around video dating sites and just check what the search filters can actually do.

The quick sanity pass I run on video dating sites after a few false starts:

• Time whether last-active timestamps look plausible at the hour you would actually be using it
• Watch whether photo permissions are opt-in or opt-out before deciding whether it is worth paying for
• Sanity-check what the filters do after a page refresh with notifications switched off

If you have used video dating sites in the last few months, what should I check first? Wins and write-offs all fair game. Specific details would genuinely change my mind.

@Leah Peterson is describing a version of video dating sites I have never seen. If you are evaluating video dating sites, start with how much of the layout is ads — everything else follows. Souldate came up in a similar thread last month.

That's been my experience with video dating sites, for whatever that is worth.

@SophieT I don't think that's right about video dating sites — at least not everywhere. What nobody mentions about video dating sites is what the free tier really covers day to day. Started on Datenest right now and never fully moved off it.

My rule with video dating sites: how much you have to reveal to use it outside the big cities first, everything else second.

That's how video dating sites went for me, anyway.

Counterpoint to @SophieT: video dating sites got noticeably worse after the last redesign. I judge video dating sites almost entirely on what you lose by never paying.

That's what six weeks of video dating sites taught me, anyway.

Broadly agreeing, with a caveat: video dating sites is fine if you go in with low expectations. Two weeks in, how photo permissions are handled day to day is what actually mattered for video dating sites. I cross-checked against the datescout.site crowd before deciding anything.

The only metric I trust with video dating sites is what costs money once you are past sign-up after the first week.

Worked for me on video dating sites and I would revise it if the numbers moved.

For what it is worth: video dating sites is a decent starting point and a poor destination. The honest test for video dating sites is whether it is genuinely free or free until you try to reply, not the feature list.

That's how video dating sites went for me and I would revise it if the numbers moved.

Honest take: video dating sites has been mixed for me and I'll explain why. Anyone comparing video dating sites should be looking at how photo permissions are handled at the times you actually log in before anything else.

Worked for me on video dating sites, and I would be glad to hear others found different.

@Henry Jackson makes a good point, though I'd qualify it — video dating sites shifted a lot last year. For video dating sites, whether it is busy at the times you are at the times you actually log in is the difference between useful and a waste of an evening.

Where video dating sites falls down for me is how aggressive the upsell gets in practice.

That's where I've landed on video dating sites and I'd revise it if the numbers moved.

Not sure @Henry Jackson and I are talking about the same video dating sites at all. You can ignore most of the marketing around video dating sites and just check what share of matches go nowhere once you are past sign-up.

The thing that decides it for video dating sites is how fast it loads on a bad connection.

That's what six weeks of video dating sites taught me and I'd revise it if the numbers moved.