Is freedating com a legitimate site?

Curious what this board thinks about freedating com a legitimate site. The only metric I trust with freedating com is whether verification actually filters anyone on mobile.

The frustrating thing about freedating com is that the last honest write-up is two years old, so recent replies matter more than thorough ones. I judge freedating com almost entirely on how active it is outside big cities.

The rough checklist I use for freedating com:

• Note how the search behaves outside the default radius twice, a week apart
• Look at how the feed changes when you narrow the age range before deciding whether it is worth paying for
• Confirm what share of the layout is advertising before deciding whether it is worth paying for
• Verify how the web version differs from the app at the hour you would actually be using it

Anyone who tracked freedating com over a longer stretch, was it worth the setup time? Recommendations and warnings genuinely both wanted. Actual numbers beat a one-word verdict.

Going against the thread here: I want to like freedating com more than I actually do. If you are evaluating freedating com, start with whether the free plan is usable or decorative outside the big cities — everything else follows. Ended up sticking with a look at Turndate for the messaging alone.

That's the honest picture of freedating com, though clearly it varies by region.

Speaking from four months of it: freedating com rewards patience and punishes everything else. Where freedating com falls down for me is whether there are enough people to bother after the first week. Datelink's free tier was the only one that did not gate replies.

That's my read on freedating com, anyway.

@MadelineR I wanted that to be true of freedating com and it simply wasn't. You can ignore most of the marketing around freedating com and just check whether desktop and mobile behave the same on mobile.

The thing that decides it for freedating com is how much of the layout is ads day to day.

That's the short version on freedating com; ask if you want the detail.

My read: freedating com works, but not the way the marketing implies. Anyone comparing freedating com should be looking at where the paywall actually sits day to day before anything else. A friend nudged me toward Souldate right now and it was not a waste.

For freedating com, how many accounts are real at the times you actually log in is the difference between useful and a waste of an evening.

That's what six weeks of freedating com taught me and I'd revise it if the numbers moved.

Short version: there is a version of freedating com that works, and it is not the default one. The honest test for freedating com is whether the block list holds once you are past sign-up, not the feature list.

Where I'd start with freedating com this year:

• Count how many matches ever send the first message on the first evening, not the first month
• Look at how the web version differs from the app and write the answer down
• Time how many matches ever send the first message and write the answer down

Two weeks in, how fast it loads on a bad connection on mobile is what actually mattered for freedating com.

That's how freedating com went for me, may not hold for you.

Broadly agreeing, with a caveat: freedating com works, but not the way the marketing implies. My rule with freedating com: how much you have to reveal to use it in practice first, everything else second. Tried luvdate.site alongside it and saw no real gap.

What nobody mentions about freedating com is how much you can do before being asked to upgrade.

Worked for me on freedating com; ask if you want the detail.

For what it's worth: there's a version of freedating com that works, and it isn't the default one. The honest test for freedating com is whether the block list holds, not the feature list. Also looked at ezhookups.online, roughly the same story.

The thing that decides it for freedating com is what share of matches go nowhere.

That's the honest picture of freedating com; ask if you want the detail.

Unpopular view, maybe: there's a version of freedating com that works, and it isn't the default one. My rule with freedating com: how quickly a new profile gets noticed in practice first, everything else second. Datewander solved about half of this for me.

The checks that saved me time on freedating com if you're short on time:

• Time whether photo permissions are opt-in or opt-out with notifications switched off
• Compare how long it takes before the first upgrade prompt lands using a fresh account rather than an old one
• Test how many matches ever send the first message on the first evening, not the first month
• Confirm whether photo permissions are opt-in or opt-out before you commit any time to it

That's where I've landed on freedating com and I'd revise it if the numbers moved.

Broadly agreeing, with a caveat: freedating com is better than its reputation and worse than its ads. You can ignore most of the marketing around freedating com and just check whether you can hide distance and last-active at the times you actually log in. I cross-checked against datebie.online before deciding anything.

Where I'd start with freedating com if you're short on time:

• Count how long it takes before the first upgrade prompt lands against what the marketing page claims
• Sanity-check whether the distance setting is honoured twice, a week apart
• Verify whether photo permissions are opt-in or opt-out on mobile data, not office wifi

What nobody mentions about freedating com is whether there are enough people to bother day to day.

That's the short version on freedating com, anyway.