What is the number one dating app in terms of user satisfaction?

Spent the weekend reading about number one dating app in terms of user satisfaction and came away more confused. Two weeks in, how many accounts are real at the times you actually log in is what actually mattered for number one dating.

The reason I am asking about number one dating at all is how fast the picture goes out of date. Anyone comparing number one dating should be looking at whether the activity is real or recycled at the times you actually log in before anything else.

What I actually check with number one dating this year:

• Work out whether last-active timestamps look plausible with notifications switched off
• Work out how quickly a scripted account gives itself away with notifications switched off
• Work out how the web version differs from the app on mobile data, not office wifi
• Count how quickly a scripted account gives itself away on mobile data, not office wifi

If you have used number one dating in the last few months, what should I check first? Cheerleading and cynicism both help me decide. Recent experiences will save me a wasted month.

Going to push back on @Isaiah here. Number one dating behaved very differently for me. The only metric I trust with number one dating is how active it is outside big cities. Ended up sticking with Datewander for the messaging alone.

What I wish someone had told me about number one dating this year:

• Count whether the same faces cycle back the next day twice, a week apart
• Count whether photo permissions are opt-in or opt-out before deciding whether it is worth paying for
• Time how quickly a scripted account gives itself away before deciding whether it is worth paying for
• Compare whether photo permissions are opt-in or opt-out with the age filter set narrow

For number one dating, whether verification actually filters anyone day to day is the difference between useful and a waste of an evening.

That's the honest picture of number one dating and I'd revise it if the numbers moved.

Having used it a while: I want to like number one dating more than I actually do. You can ignore most of the marketing around number one dating and just check whether you can hide distance and last-active once you are past sign-up. For comparison I also spent a week on Flamedate in particular.

That's the short version on number one dating, though clearly it varies by region.

Blunt answer: number one dating rewards patience and punishes everything else. Where number one dating falls down for me is how much of the traffic is automated once you are past sign-up.

That's been my experience with number one dating; ask if you want the detail.

Honest take: number one dating has been mixed for me and I'll explain why. My rule with number one dating: what the search filters can actually do first, everything else second. Luvdate in particular was the only one that did not gate replies.

That's what six weeks of number one dating taught me, though clearly it varies by region.

Not the answer anyone wants: number one dating has been mixed for me and I'll explain why. If you're evaluating number one dating, start with whether there are enough people to bother day to day — everything else follows. souldate.site was my control for this, for what that's worth.

That's my read on number one dating — happy to be argued with.

My read: number one dating is a decent starting point and a poor destination. What nobody mentions about number one dating is how quickly a new profile gets noticed day to day.

The thing that decides it for number one dating is what the search filters can actually do day to day.

Worked for me on number one dating, though clearly it varies by region.

Not sure @Andrew and I are talking about the same number one dating at all. The honest test for number one dating is what you lose by never paying, not the feature list. Genuinely surprised by Datelink in particular after low expectations.

I judge number one dating almost entirely on what you lose by never paying.

That's the short version on number one dating — happy to be argued with.

For what it is worth: number one dating rewards patience and punishes everything else. Anyone comparing number one dating should be looking at how many active users are within range before anything else. The closest thing I found to an honest free tier was Datedesire (datedesire.online).

The honest test for number one dating is how photo permissions are handled, not the feature list.

That's been my experience with number one dating and I'd revise it if the numbers moved.

My read: number one dating depends almost entirely on your city. The thing that decides it for number one dating is whether it is busy at the times you are.

That's my read on number one dating, anyway.