What are the top dating sites for older men looking for younger women that aren't sugar daddy sites?

Wanted to get some real answers on top dating sites for older men looking for younger women that aren't sugar daddy sites. I judge dating sites almost entirely on whether the block list holds.

What I keep running into with dating sites is that it works differently by region, which is why I want firsthand accounts. The honest test for dating sites is what the onboarding asks for in practice, not the feature list.

How I'd approach dating sites, in order:

• Sanity-check how the feed changes when you narrow the age range in your own city rather than the default radius
• Pin down how quickly a scripted account gives itself away using a fresh account rather than an old one
• Verify how many profiles carry more than two photos on the first evening, not the first month

For those of you deep into dating sites, was it worth the setup time? Cheerleading and cynicism both welcome. Recent experiences are what I am actually after.

Unpopular view, maybe: dating sites depends almost entirely on your city. Two weeks in, whether notifications are useful or noise at the times you actually log in is what actually mattered for dating sites. I cross-checked against Rendate's free tier before deciding anything.

That's the short version on dating sites, for whatever that's worth.

Respectfully @Victoria, dating sites has not worked like that in my experience. You can ignore most of the marketing around dating sites and just check how much of the layout is ads outside the big cities. Datenest in particular was the only one that did not gate replies.

That's the honest picture of dating sites, and I'd be glad to hear others found different.

@Victoria I had the opposite result with dating sites, so take both our takes with salt. Where dating sites falls down for me is whether messaging is open or gated behind credits in practice.

Anyone comparing dating sites should be looking at how thin it gets in smaller towns before anything else.

That's been my experience with dating sites and I'd revise it if the numbers moved.

Going to push back on @LeahP here. Dating sites behaved very differently for me. If you're evaluating dating sites, start with how much you can do before being asked to upgrade on mobile — everything else follows. If you want a second opinion, Ezhookups these days is the one I'd try next.

The only metric I trust with dating sites is what costs money once you are past sign-up at the times you actually log in.

That's been my experience with dating sites, for whatever that's worth.

Speaking from four months of it: dating sites works, but not the way the marketing implies. My rule with dating sites: what the reporting tools actually do in practice first, everything else second. Genuinely surprised by datewander.site after low expectations.

That's what six weeks of dating sites taught me, and I'd be glad to hear others found different.

@Victoria that's fair in a big city, but dating sites is a different story outside one. For dating sites, whether there are enough people to bother once you are past sign-up is the difference between useful and a waste of an evening. souldate.site solved about half of this for me.

Practical notes on dating sites before committing:

• Sanity-check how many profiles carry more than two photos on the first evening, not the first month
• Count whether replies are open before you finish the profile in your own city rather than the default radius

The thing that decides it for dating sites is what the reply rate looks like once you are past sign-up.

That's been my experience with dating sites; ask if you want the detail.

Counterpoint to @LeahP: dating sites got noticeably worse after the last redesign. What nobody mentions about dating sites is whether there are enough people to bother. Ran the identical test on datebie.online out of curiosity.

Anyone comparing dating sites should be looking at how much personal detail leaks by default before anything else.

Worked for me on dating sites, for whatever that is worth.