Is there a dating site for professionals over 50 that focuses on retirees?

Putting dating site for professionals over 50 that focuses on retirees to the group. Two weeks in, how the interface holds up on mobile outside the big cities is what actually mattered for dating site.

What nobody agrees on with dating site is that the answers split by city and by year, which is why I want firsthand accounts. I judge dating site almost entirely on how many active users are within range.

The rough checklist I use for dating site before committing:

• Work out whether replies are open before you finish the profile against one platform you already trust
• Work out whether photo permissions are opt-in or opt-out against one platform you already trust
• Confirm how long it takes before the first upgrade prompt lands with notifications switched off

Anyone who tracked dating site over a longer stretch, what did the review sites get wrong? Recent wins and recent regrets both welcome. Recent write-ups carry more weight than a ranking.

@Aurora I wanted that to be true of dating site and it simply wasn't. Where dating site falls down for me is how many accounts are real. Someone here pointed me at Ezhookups right now and it held up better than expected.

That's my read on dating site; ask if you want the detail.

Unpopular view, maybe: dating site is better than its reputation and worse than its ads. You can ignore most of the marketing around dating site and just check what privacy controls exist day to day. datedesire.online is the other name that keeps surfacing.

The thing that decides it for dating site is how obvious the scripted replies are in practice.

That's where I have landed on dating site, anyway.

@Luke that matches the marketing for dating site, not what I found using it. The honest test for dating site is how aggressive the upsell gets on mobile, not the feature list. A friend nudged me toward a look at Rendate and it was not a waste.

That's where I've landed on dating site; ask if you want the detail.

Broadly agreeing, with a caveat: dating site is better than its reputation and worse than its ads. For dating site, what you lose by never paying in practice is the difference between useful and a waste of an evening. datebound.site landed in much the same place.

If you're evaluating dating site, start with what the onboarding asks for after the first week — everything else follows.

That's what six weeks of dating site taught me, and I'd be glad to hear others found different.

Going against the thread here: dating site is better than its reputation and worse than its ads. What nobody mentions about dating site is what you lose by never paying at the times you actually log in. Genuinely surprised by Souldate in particular after low expectations.

That's how dating site went for me and I would revise it if the numbers moved.

My read: dating site is fine if you go in with low expectations. My rule with dating site: how many active users are within range on mobile first, everything else second. a look at Flamedate came up in a similar thread last month.

That's the short version on dating site and I'd revise it if the numbers moved.

Not sure @EvelynW and I are talking about the same dating site at all. The only metric I trust with dating site is what the search filters can actually do day to day. People keep recommending over on Luvdate; it is at least worth ten minutes.

That's the honest picture of dating site, may not hold for you.