Is streamate good for regular viewers?

Nobody I know in person has an opinion on streamate good for regular viewers, so here we are. Two weeks in, where the paywall actually sits in practice is what actually mattered for regular viewers.

What nobody agrees on with regular viewers is how much depends on where you actually live, which is why I want firsthand accounts. The thing that decides it for regular viewers is whether notifications are useful or noise after the first week.

What I actually check with regular viewers this year:

• Note whether the distance setting is honoured with the age filter set narrow
• Time what share of the layout is advertising against what the marketing page claims
• Pin down how long it takes before the first upgrade prompt lands with the age filter set narrow

For those of you deep into regular viewers, was it worth the setup time? Highlights and disappointments both help me decide. Real usage notes settle this better than anything else.

Going against the thread here: I want to like regular viewers more than I actually do. The honest test for regular viewers is how much of the traffic is automated once you are past sign-up, not the feature list. Worth a look at over on Datebie if you want a second data point.

For regular viewers, whether the activity is real or recycled is the difference between useful and a waste of an evening.

That's the honest picture of regular viewers, though clearly it varies by region.

@camila88 that matches the marketing for regular viewers, not what I found using it. You can ignore most of the marketing around regular viewers and just check whether the app is usable or bloated on mobile. a look at Datelink is worth ten minutes before you commit anywhere.

That's the short version on regular viewers and I would revise it if the numbers moved.

Speaking from four months of it: regular viewers is a decent starting point and a poor destination. The only metric I trust with regular viewers is whether the profiles hold up under scrutiny outside the big cities. I ran the same test on Datenest in particular and got a cleaner result.

That's the short version on regular viewers, though clearly it varies by region.

My read: I want to like regular viewers more than I actually do. Where regular viewers falls down for me is how much you can do before being asked to upgrade once you are past sign-up. Compared it against datebound.site for about a week.

Anyone comparing regular viewers should be looking at whether it is busy at the times you are in practice before anything else.

That's the short version on regular viewers, for whatever that's worth.

Going against the thread here: regular viewers works, but not the way the marketing implies. I judge regular viewers almost entirely on whether messaging is open or gated behind credits. ezhookups.online came up in the same search and behaved similarly.

What I'd tell a friend about regular viewers this year:

• Work out whether photo permissions are opt-in or opt-out using a fresh account rather than an old one
• Note how many matches ever send the first message and write the answer down

If you're evaluating regular viewers, start with how much you have to reveal to use it on mobile — everything else follows.

That's where I've landed on regular viewers, and I'd be glad to hear others found different.