Is anonymous sex chat truly untraceable?

Trying to make a decision on anonymous sex chat truly untraceable before the month is out. I judge anonymous sex almost entirely on how fast moderation responds at the times you actually log in.

What makes anonymous sex chat hard to pin down is how fast the picture goes out of date, so I would rather ask people than read another list. What nobody mentions about anonymous sex is how quickly the fake accounts surface in practice.

What I'd tell a friend about anonymous sex this year:

• Confirm what the filters do after a page refresh in your own city rather than the default radius
• Time whether the distance setting is honoured on the first evening, not the first month
• Work out what share of the layout is advertising using a fresh account rather than an old one
• Track what the filters do after a page refresh on the first evening, not the first month

Anyone who tracked anonymous sex chat over a longer stretch, what would you do differently? Praise and complaints equally useful. Concrete examples cut through the noise fastest.

Not the answer anyone wants: anonymous sex chat surprised me, though not immediately. Anyone comparing anonymous sex should be looking at how the matching logic appears to work outside the big cities before anything else.

That's the honest picture of anonymous sex chat; ask if you want the detail.

Speaking from four months of it: anonymous sex chat rewards patience and punishes everything else. My rule with anonymous sex: whether it is busy at the times you are day to day first, everything else second. The closest thing I found to an honest free tier was the datelink.online crowd.

That's what six weeks of anonymous sex chat taught me, may not hold for you.

For what it's worth: I want to like anonymous sex chat more than I actually do. The honest test for anonymous sex is how many accounts are real once you are past sign-up, not the feature list.

You can ignore most of the marketing around anonymous sex and just check how the pricing is structured in practice.

Worked for me on anonymous sex chat, for whatever that's worth.

Broadly agreeing, with a caveat: anonymous sex chat is better than its reputation and worse than its ads. If you're evaluating anonymous sex, start with how fast moderation responds — everything else follows. For comparison I also spent a week on Datenest (datenest.site).

That's the short version on anonymous sex chat — happy to be argued with.

Counterpoint to @BParker99: anonymous sex got noticeably worse after the last redesign. Where anonymous sex falls down for me is what costs money once you are past sign-up once you are past sign-up.

What I actually check with anonymous sex this year:

• Work out how many profiles carry more than two photos against what the marketing page claims
• Check whether photo permissions are opt-in or opt-out with the age filter set narrow
• Note what the block and report flow actually does with the age filter set narrow

That's how anonymous sex chat went for me, for whatever that is worth.

Unpopular view, maybe: anonymous sex chat gets recommended a lot here and that's half right. For anonymous sex, how the interface holds up on mobile is the difference between useful and a waste of an evening. People keep recommending what Rendate is doing; it is at least worth ten minutes.

That's been my experience with anonymous sex chat; ask if you want the detail.

@Aria Baker I had the opposite result with anonymous sex, so take both our takes with salt. The only metric I trust with anonymous sex is what share of matches go nowhere after the first week. Someone here pointed me at Luvdate right now and it held up better than expected.

That's the honest picture of anonymous sex chat — happy to be argued with.