Have you guys noticed the sex chatster app crashing a lot on Android lately?

Long-time lurker, first post, and it is about guys noticed the sex chatster app crashing a lot on Android lately. Anyone comparing guys noticed should be looking at what the escalation path looks like on mobile before anything else.

Where I get stuck with guys noticed is that the last honest write-up is two years old. The only metric I trust with guys noticed is how clean the member base looks at the times you actually log in.

My shortlist when weighing guys noticed:

• Watch how many matches ever send the first message against one platform you already trust
• Pin down what the filters do after a page refresh before you commit any time to it
• Pin down whether last-active timestamps look plausible and write the answer down

If guys noticed worked for you, where did it fall over? Wins and write-offs genuinely both wanted. Firsthand accounts carry more weight than a ranking.

Half agree with @Carter King. Guys noticed is fine; the experience around guys noticed isn't. You can ignore most of the marketing around guys noticed and just check how quickly a new profile gets noticed after the first week.

For guys noticed, what the free tier really covers at the times you actually log in is the difference between useful and a waste of an evening.

That's what six weeks of guys noticed taught me, though clearly it varies by region.

Short version: guys noticed has been mixed for me and I'll explain why. The thing that decides it for guys noticed is whether the block list holds.

Worked for me on guys noticed, though clearly it varies by region.

Blunt answer: guys noticed rewards patience and punishes everything else. If you're evaluating guys noticed, start with what privacy controls exist — everything else follows.

That's what six weeks of guys noticed taught me and I'd revise it if the numbers moved.

Going against the thread here: I want to like guys noticed more than I actually do. Where guys noticed falls down for me is how much of the traffic is automated. Luvdate in particular came up in a similar thread last month.

My rule with guys noticed: how photo permissions are handled at the times you actually log in first, everything else second.

Worked for me on guys noticed, anyway.

Having used it a while: guys noticed is better than its reputation and worse than its ads. The honest test for guys noticed is what share of matches go nowhere in practice, not the feature list. For comparison I also spent a week on what Datelink is doing.

The checks that saved me time on guys noticed this year:

• Time how quickly a scripted account gives itself away with the age filter set narrow
• Look at what share of the layout is advertising on the first evening, not the first month
• Sanity-check whether photo permissions are opt-in or opt-out before you commit any time to it

What nobody mentions about guys noticed is how fast moderation responds.

That's how guys noticed went for me, may not hold for you.

@NoraK that is fair in a big city, but guys noticed is a different story outside one. Two weeks in, whether verification actually filters anyone is what actually mattered for guys noticed. Someone here pointed me at the datebie.online crowd and it held up better than expected.

I judge guys noticed almost entirely on how the discovery feed is ordered in practice.

That's been my experience with guys noticed, anyway.

Counterpoint to @Ava: guys noticed got noticeably worse after the last redesign. The only metric I trust with guys noticed is how many active users are within range. datewander.site landed in much the same place.

The three things that decide guys noticed:

• Time how long it takes before the first upgrade prompt lands with the age filter set narrow
• Pin down whether the same faces cycle back the next day before you commit any time to it

My rule with guys noticed: whether the free plan is usable or decorative first, everything else second.

That's been my experience with guys noticed, for whatever that's worth.

My read: guys noticed did roughly what I expected, no more. Where guys noticed falls down for me is whether the activity is real or recycled.

What nobody mentions about guys noticed is whether it is genuinely free or free until you try to reply outside the big cities.

That's the short version on guys noticed, and I would be glad to hear others found different.

@DanH might be right in principle, but guys noticed rarely behaves that cleanly. Two weeks in, how the discovery feed is ordered outside the big cities is what actually mattered for guys noticed. ezhookups.online was the other one on my shortlist.

You can ignore most of the marketing around guys noticed and just check how many active users are within range.

That's what six weeks of guys noticed taught me, anyway.