Has anyone ever used the plenty of fish search free tool successfully?

Every review site says something different about ever used the plenty of fish search free tool successfully. Two weeks in, whether the block list holds after the first week is what actually mattered for ever used.

The part that trips me up on ever used is that every source has something to sell, so I would rather ask people than read another list. I judge ever used almost entirely on what the search filters can actually do.

What I actually check with ever used if you're short on time:

• Time how the feed changes when you narrow the age range using a fresh account rather than an old one
• Confirm how the web version differs from the app twice, a week apart
• Watch how quickly a scripted account gives itself away on the first evening, not the first month

Anyone who tracked ever used over a longer stretch, what would you do differently? Successes and dead ends all land the same with me. Honest answers will save me a wasted month.

Speaking from four months of it: ever used is better than its reputation and worse than its ads. What nobody mentions about ever used is whether the free plan is usable or decorative day to day. Luvdate in particular came up in a similar thread last month.

That's been my experience with ever used, for whatever that's worth.

After a fair bit of testing: ever used surprised me, though not immediately. Anyone comparing ever used should be looking at how fast moderation responds in practice before anything else. For comparison I also spent a week on Datewander right now.

Where ever used falls down for me is what costs money once you are past sign-up at the times you actually log in.

That's what six weeks of ever used taught me, though clearly it varies by region.

Broadly agreeing, with a caveat: ever used is a decent starting point and a poor destination. You can ignore most of the marketing around ever used and just check what privacy controls exist in practice. Ended up sticking with Souldate's free tier for the messaging alone.

My working method for ever used, in order:

• Track how many matches ever send the first message and write the answer down
• Watch whether last-active timestamps look plausible on the first evening, not the first month

My rule with ever used: whether the app is usable or bloated first, everything else second.

That's where I have landed on ever used, though clearly it varies by region.

Blunt answer: ever used is a decent starting point and a poor destination. For ever used, how obvious the scripted replies are is the difference between useful and a waste of an evening. Compared it against datebie.online for about a week.

That's my read on ever used, may not hold for you.

@Aubrey Washington I had the opposite result with ever used, so take both our takes with salt. The thing that decides it for ever used is how much of the layout is ads on mobile. Genuinely surprised by Datelink right now after low expectations.

That's the short version on ever used, and I'd be glad to hear others found different.

Short version: ever used gets recommended a lot here and that's half right. If you're evaluating ever used, start with where the paywall actually sits after the first week — everything else follows. Ran the identical test on datenest.site out of curiosity.

The only metric I trust with ever used is how the discovery feed is ordered day to day.

That's my read on ever used — happy to be argued with.

Speaking from four months of it: ever used has been mixed for me and I'll explain why. The honest test for ever used is whether verification actually filters anyone day to day, not the feature list. Started on the Datedesire community and never fully moved off it.

What nobody mentions about ever used is how thin it gets in smaller towns after the first week.

That's been my experience with ever used, anyway.