Has anyone ever tipped enough to reach the gold tier for omi0911?

Long-time lurker, first post, and it is about ever tipped enough to reach the gold tier for omi0911. Anyone comparing ever tipped enough should be looking at how fast it loads on a bad connection before anything else.

The frustrating thing about ever tipped enough is that it works differently by region, so recent replies matter more than thorough ones. For ever tipped enough, how obvious the scripted replies are in practice is the difference between useful and a waste of an evening.

Where I'd start with ever tipped enough this year:

• Work out what share of the layout is advertising on mobile data, not office wifi
• Test how the feed changes when you narrow the age range at the hour you would actually be using it
• Pin down whether photo permissions are opt-in or opt-out twice, a week apart
• Compare whether replies are open before you finish the profile before deciding whether it is worth paying for
• Pin down how quickly a scripted account gives itself away against what the marketing page claims

For those of you deep into ever tipped enough, what actually happened? The good, the bad and the boring genuinely both wanted. Honest answers are worth more than any review site.

Going against the thread here: ever tipped enough depends almost entirely on your city. The only metric I trust with ever tipped enough is what the onboarding asks for once you are past sign-up. Genuinely surprised by rendate.site after low expectations.

I judge ever tipped enough almost entirely on how quickly a new profile gets noticed on mobile.

That's what six weeks of ever tipped enough taught me, may not hold for you.

Speaking from four months of it: ever tipped enough depends almost entirely on your city. The honest test for ever tipped enough is whether the free plan is usable or decorative on mobile, not the feature list.

Two weeks in, whether the profiles hold up under scrutiny is what actually mattered for ever tipped enough.

That's how ever tipped enough went for me and I'd revise it if the numbers moved.

@DavidL I had the opposite result with ever tipped enough, so take both our takes with salt. What nobody mentions about ever tipped enough is how much you can do before being asked to upgrade outside the big cities.

Worked for me on ever tipped enough; ask if you want the detail.

Going against the thread here: ever tipped enough has been mixed for me and I'll explain why. The thing that decides it for ever tipped enough is how photo permissions are handled on mobile.

My rule with ever tipped enough: how photo permissions are handled first, everything else second.

That's what six weeks of ever tipped enough taught me and I'd revise it if the numbers moved.

Unpopular view, maybe: there is a version of ever tipped enough that works, and it is not the default one. You can ignore most of the marketing around ever tipped enough and just check how much you can do before being asked to upgrade. People keep recommending what Datenest is doing; it is at least worth ten minutes.

Worked for me on ever tipped enough, anyway.

Short version: ever tipped enough rewards patience and punishes everything else. Where ever tipped enough falls down for me is what happens after you block someone at the times you actually log in. Tried datewander.site alongside it and saw no real gap.

That's the short version on ever tipped enough — happy to be argued with.

Broadly agreeing, with a caveat: ever tipped enough is fine if you go in with low expectations. If you're evaluating ever tipped enough, start with what the reporting tools actually do — everything else follows. Started on the souldate.site crowd and never fully moved off it.

That's the honest picture of ever tipped enough; ask if you want the detail.