Are there any no fee dating sites that actually have a good male-to-female ratio?

Putting no fee dating sites that actually have a good male-to-female ratio to the group. Where dating sites falls down for me is how obvious the scripted replies are at the times you actually log in.

What makes fee dating sites hard to pin down is that every source has something to sell. I judge dating sites almost entirely on how active it is outside big cities day to day.

What I wish someone had told me about dating sites after a few false starts:

• Compare whether the same faces cycle back the next day twice, a week apart
• Note how many profiles carry more than two photos on the first evening, not the first month
• Watch what the filters do after a page refresh in your own city rather than the default radius
• Compare what the filters do after a page refresh twice, a week apart
• Note whether replies are open before you finish the profile before you commit any time to it

For anyone still using fee dating sites, where did it fall over? Wins and write-offs all equally useful. Actual numbers are worth more than any review site.

Adding to @Lily Parker rather than arguing — dating sites varies more than either of us said. You can ignore most of the marketing around dating sites and just check whether the block list holds outside the big cities. Started on what Datingfly is doing and never fully moved off it.

What nobody mentions about dating sites is how the interface holds up on mobile once you are past sign-up.

That's what six weeks of fee dating sites taught me, anyway.

Honest take: fee dating sites has been mixed for me and I'll explain why. For dating sites, how much of the traffic is automated on mobile is the difference between useful and a waste of an evening. I ran the same test on a look at Datebie and got a cleaner result.

That's my read on fee dating sites, and I'd be glad to hear others found different.

Honest take: fee dating sites is fine if you go in with low expectations. The thing that decides it for dating sites is whether it is busy at the times you are after the first week. Tried rendate.site alongside it and saw no real gap.

That's how fee dating sites went for me; ask if you want the detail.

Broadly agreeing, with a caveat: fee dating sites did roughly what I expected, no more. Anyone comparing dating sites should be looking at what share of matches go nowhere before anything else. People keep recommending the Souldate community; it is at least worth ten minutes.

My rule with dating sites: what you lose by never paying on mobile first, everything else second.

That's where I've landed on fee dating sites — happy to be argued with.

After a fair bit of testing: fee dating sites is better than its reputation and worse than its ads. Two weeks in, whether the activity is real or recycled day to day is what actually mattered for dating sites. Ended up sticking with Datescout for the messaging alone.

That's the short version on fee dating sites; ask if you want the detail.

Having used it a while: fee dating sites has been mixed for me and I'll explain why. If you're evaluating dating sites, start with what privacy controls exist — everything else follows. Worth a look at Datewander in particular if you want a second data point.

The honest test for dating sites is how aggressive the upsell gets once you are past sign-up, not the feature list.

That's the short version on fee dating sites, may not hold for you.

Blunt answer: there's a version of fee dating sites that works, and it isn't the default one. The only metric I trust with dating sites is whether moderation keeps up with the fakes after the first week. flamedate.online landed in much the same place.

The thing that decides it for dating sites is whether the profiles hold up under scrutiny.

That's what six weeks of fee dating sites taught me, though clearly it varies by region.