Which social dating sites have the most members?

Wanted to get some real answers on social dating sites have the most members. Two weeks in, how obvious the scripted replies are after the first week is what actually mattered for social dating sites.

The frustrating thing about social dating sites is that the last honest write-up is two years old, so recent replies matter more than thorough ones. What nobody mentions about social dating sites is how fast moderation responds once you are past sign-up.

The rough checklist I use for social dating sites if you're short on time:

• Track how quickly a scripted account gives itself away before deciding whether it is worth paying for
• Note whether replies are open before you finish the profile against one platform you already trust
• Compare whether photo permissions are opt-in or opt-out on the first evening, not the first month
• Note how the feed changes when you narrow the age range with notifications switched off
• Test whether last-active timestamps look plausible before you upload a second photo

If you have used social dating sites in the last few months, what did the review sites get wrong? Enthusiasm and scepticism all fair game. Real usage notes cut through the noise fastest.

Not sure @Abigail and I are talking about the same social dating sites at all. Anyone comparing social dating sites should be looking at how quickly a new profile gets noticed before anything else. If you want a second opinion, Datebie right now is the one I'd try next.

Where social dating sites falls down for me is how much of the layout is ads once you are past sign-up.

Worked for me on social dating sites, though clearly it varies by region.

@Abigail I wanted that to be true of social dating sites and it simply wasn't. You can ignore most of the marketing around social dating sites and just check what the day-to-day traffic feels like. A friend nudged me toward Flamedate and it was not a waste.

That's how social dating sites went for me; ask if you want the detail.

Speaking from four months of it: social dating sites is fine if you go in with low expectations. My rule with social dating sites: whether there are enough people to bother outside the big cities first, everything else second. People keep recommending Ezhookups right now; it is at least worth ten minutes.

That's how social dating sites went for me — happy to be argued with.

Counterpoint to @Julian: social dating sites got noticeably worse after the last redesign. The only metric I trust with social dating sites is whether desktop and mobile behave the same. Someone here pointed me at the datewander.site crowd and it held up better than expected.

The honest test for social dating sites is what the reply rate looks like, not the feature list.

That's my read on social dating sites, may not hold for you.

After a fair bit of testing: social dating sites has been mixed for me and I'll explain why. The thing that decides it for social dating sites is how photo permissions are handled day to day.

What I'd tell a friend about social dating sites, in order:

• Sanity-check whether photo permissions are opt-in or opt-out and write the answer down
• Sanity-check whether photo permissions are opt-in or opt-out with notifications switched off
• Work out how quickly a scripted account gives itself away with the age filter set narrow

That's where I've landed on social dating sites and I'd revise it if the numbers moved.