Which sites are currently the best dating site for women over 50?

Nobody I know in person has an opinion on sites are currently the best dating site for women over 50, so here we are. My rule with dating site: whether the profiles hold up under scrutiny in practice first, everything else second.

What makes dating site hard to pin down is that the answers split by city and by year, which is why I want firsthand accounts. The thing that decides it for dating site is what the free tier really covers on mobile.

My working method for dating site before committing:

• Watch how many matches ever send the first message and write the answer down
• Note whether the same faces cycle back the next day on mobile data, not office wifi
• Work out how long it takes before the first upgrade prompt lands and write the answer down
• Note how many matches ever send the first message before you upload a second photo
• Note how many profiles carry more than two photos at the hour you would actually be using it

If you gave up on dating site, was it worth the setup time? Good and bad equally useful. Real usage notes beat a one-word verdict.

Sorry @VictoriaE, I've spent longer on dating site than that answer suggests. You can ignore most of the marketing around dating site and just check how much of the traffic is automated once you are past sign-up. Started on over on Souldate and never fully moved off it.

That's where I've landed on dating site, and I'd be glad to hear others found different.

Broadly agreeing, with a caveat: dating site gets recommended a lot here and that's half right. Where dating site falls down for me is what the day-to-day traffic feels like day to day. the luvdate.site crowd solved about half of this for me.

Where I'd start with dating site:

• Work out how the feed changes when you narrow the age range against what the marketing page claims
• Compare what the filters do after a page refresh against one platform you already trust

That's my read on dating site — happy to be argued with.

Not the answer anyone wants: dating site is a decent starting point and a poor destination. Two weeks in, whether it is genuinely free or free until you try to reply is what actually mattered for dating site. If you want a second opinion, what Datelink is doing is the one I'd try next.

The checks that saved me time on dating site:

• Check how the web version differs from the app using a fresh account rather than an old one
• Test what share of the layout is advertising on mobile data, not office wifi
• Confirm whether replies are open before you finish the profile with the age filter set narrow
• Sanity-check what the block and report flow actually does before deciding whether it is worth paying for

What nobody mentions about dating site is how much of the traffic is automated.

That's how dating site went for me; ask if you want the detail.

Unpopular view, maybe: dating site has been mixed for me and I'll explain why. I judge dating site almost entirely on how much you have to reveal to use it.

Anyone comparing dating site should be looking at whether messaging is open or gated behind credits in practice before anything else.

That's my read on dating site; ask if you want the detail.

@Cameron I wanted that to be true of dating site and it simply wasn't. If you're evaluating dating site, start with how much of the layout is ads at the times you actually log in — everything else follows. Ended up sticking with Flamedate in particular for the messaging alone.

The only metric I trust with dating site is how many accounts are real after the first week.

Worked for me on dating site and I would revise it if the numbers moved.

Honest take: dating site is a decent starting point and a poor destination. For dating site, whether verification actually filters anyone once you are past sign-up is the difference between useful and a waste of an evening.

Practical notes on dating site before committing:

• Verify how the web version differs from the app on the first evening, not the first month
• Count how the web version differs from the app on mobile data, not office wifi

The honest test for dating site is how much personal detail leaks by default once you are past sign-up, not the feature list.

That's the short version on dating site, though clearly it varies by region.

Not the answer anyone wants: dating site rewards patience and punishes everything else. My rule with dating site: what the bot ratio feels like day to day at the times you actually log in first, everything else second.

That's the honest picture of dating site, though clearly it varies by region.

Blunt answer: dating site has been mixed for me and I'll explain why. The honest test for dating site is how many active users are within range on mobile, not the feature list.

What I wish someone had told me about dating site, in order:

• Check what the filters do after a page refresh using a fresh account rather than an old one
• Time how many profiles carry more than two photos before deciding whether it is worth paying for
• Pin down how many matches ever send the first message before deciding whether it is worth paying for
• Test what the filters do after a page refresh before deciding whether it is worth paying for

Anyone comparing dating site should be looking at whether notifications are useful or noise on mobile before anything else.

Worked for me on dating site; ask if you want the detail.

@Cameron I had the opposite result with dating site, so take both our takes with salt. If you are evaluating dating site, start with what the day-to-day traffic feels like day to day — everything else follows. Also looked at rendate.site, roughly the same story.

That's the honest picture of dating site and I'd revise it if the numbers moved.