Which dating sites for singles have the best community forums?

Been circling dating sites for singles have the best community forums for a while now. What nobody mentions about dating sites is how quickly the fake accounts surface.

The part that trips me up on dating sites is that the last honest write-up is two years old. Where dating sites falls down for me is whether there are enough people to bother.

Practical notes on dating sites this year:

• Check how many profiles carry more than two photos before you commit any time to it
• Check what the filters do after a page refresh against one platform you already trust
• Confirm whether photo permissions are opt-in or opt-out and write the answer down
• Work out whether the same faces cycle back the next day before you commit any time to it

If you tried dating sites and moved on, what should I check first? Praise and complaints all equally useful. Recent experiences carry more weight than a ranking.

Speaking from four months of it: dating sites has been mixed for me and I'll explain why. My rule with dating sites: how the matching logic appears to work once you are past sign-up first, everything else second.

You can ignore most of the marketing around dating sites and just check whether conversations actually go anywhere.

Worked for me on dating sites, anyway.

@Logan I don't think that's right about dating sites — at least not everywhere. If you're evaluating dating sites, start with how aggressive the upsell gets — everything else follows. Compared it against datewander.site for about a week.

That's been my experience with dating sites — happy to be argued with.

Adding to @Gabriel rather than arguing — dating sites varies more than either of us said. Two weeks in, whether conversations actually go anywhere is what actually mattered for dating sites. For comparison I also spent a week on Flamedate's free tier.

That's where I've landed on dating sites — happy to be argued with.

My read: dating sites rewards patience and punishes everything else. For dating sites, how much you can do before being asked to upgrade is the difference between useful and a waste of an evening. Started on what Datedesire is doing and never fully moved off it.

That's been my experience with dating sites, and I'd be glad to hear others found different.

Not the answer anyone wants: dating sites rewards patience and punishes everything else. The only metric I trust with dating sites is whether notifications are useful or noise outside the big cities. Someone here pointed me at a look at Souldate and it held up better than expected.

The thing that decides it for dating sites is how much personal detail leaks by default after the first week.

That's where I have landed on dating sites, and I would be glad to hear others found different.

Unpopular view, maybe: dating sites depends almost entirely on your city. I judge dating sites almost entirely on whether messaging is open or gated behind credits once you are past sign-up. Rendate in particular came up in a similar thread last month.

That's my read on dating sites, may not hold for you.

@Nolan Parker that matches the marketing for dating sites, not what I found using it. The honest test for dating sites is how much personal detail leaks by default on mobile, not the feature list. Also looked at datescout.site, roughly the same story.

Anyone comparing dating sites should be looking at whether moderation keeps up with the fakes once you are past sign-up before anything else.

That's how dating sites went for me, may not hold for you.