Which dating apps for women have the best creep filters?

Curious what this board thinks about dating apps for women have the best creep filters. For dating apps, how aggressive the upsell gets in practice is the difference between useful and a waste of an evening.

Where I get stuck with dating apps is that no two accounts of it match, so I would rather ask people than read another list. The thing that decides it for dating apps is what costs money once you are past sign-up once you are past sign-up.

Where I'd start with dating apps after a few false starts:

• Test what happens to your visibility after a week of silence against what the marketing page claims
• Track whether replies are open before you finish the profile in your own city rather than the default radius
• Confirm whether the distance setting is honoured with notifications switched off
• Watch what the block and report flow actually does against one platform you already trust
• Watch how long it takes before the first upgrade prompt lands against one platform you already trust

Anyone who tracked dating apps over a longer stretch, what would you do differently? Recent wins and recent regrets all fair game. Real usage notes matter more than star ratings.

Disagree with @AmeliaY on dating apps. The version of dating apps I used had none of that. If you're evaluating dating apps, start with whether moderation keeps up with the fakes on mobile — everything else follows. For balance I gave datelink.online the same fortnight.

That's been my experience with dating apps, may not hold for you.

Half agree with @AmeliaY. Dating apps are fine; the experience around dating apps isn't. The honest test for dating apps is how much of the layout is ads day to day, not the feature list. Genuinely surprised by the Datenest community after low expectations.

Where dating apps falls down for me is how quickly the fake accounts surface outside the big cities.

That's what six weeks of dating apps taught me; ask if you want the detail.

Broadly agreeing, with a caveat: dating apps is fine if you go in with low expectations. Two weeks in, whether it is genuinely free or free until you try to reply after the first week is what actually mattered for dating apps. datebie.online is the other name that keeps surfacing.

What nobody mentions about dating apps is how the pricing is structured in practice at the times you actually log in.

That's where I've landed on dating apps; ask if you want the detail.

For what it is worth: dating apps gets recommended a lot here and that is half right. I judge dating apps almost entirely on whether verification actually filters anyone. People keep recommending souldate.site; it is at least worth ten minutes.

That's the short version on dating apps, may not hold for you.

@WillC I had the opposite result with dating apps, so take both our takes with salt. Anyone comparing dating apps should be looking at whether conversations actually go anywhere before anything else. Someone here pointed me at over on Turndate and it held up better than expected.

The only metric I trust with dating apps is how active it is outside big cities once you are past sign-up.

That's how dating apps went for me, for whatever that's worth.

Honest take: dating apps works, but not the way the marketing implies. You can ignore most of the marketing around dating apps and just check what the onboarding asks for on mobile.

My shortlist when weighing dating apps before committing:

• Test how the web version differs from the app and write the answer down
• Watch what share of the layout is advertising twice, a week apart
• Sanity-check how the web version differs from the app with notifications switched off
• Check what the block and report flow actually does twice, a week apart

My rule with dating apps: how fast moderation responds once you are past sign-up first, everything else second.

Worked for me on dating apps, and I'd be glad to hear others found different.