Which are the most famous dating sites?

Wanted to get some real answers on most famous dating sites. If you're evaluating famous dating sites, start with how fast it loads on a bad connection outside the big cities — everything else follows.

The part that trips me up on famous dating sites is that the free and paid experiences barely overlap. The thing that decides it for famous dating sites is how active it is outside big cities day to day.

The rough checklist I use for famous dating sites, in order:

• Note whether photo permissions are opt-in or opt-out using a fresh account rather than an old one
• Look at how the web version differs from the app before deciding whether it is worth paying for
• Check whether replies are open before you finish the profile using a fresh account rather than an old one
• Note how many profiles carry more than two photos before you upload a second photo

Anyone with recent time on famous dating sites, was it worth the setup time? The good, the bad and the boring both welcome. Recent experiences beat a one-word verdict.

Not sure @Violet and I are talking about the same famous dating sites at all. The honest test for famous dating sites is how many active users are within range in practice, not the feature list.

That's where I've landed on famous dating sites, though clearly it varies by region.

My read: famous dating sites is a decent starting point and a poor destination. Two weeks in, how the pricing is structured in practice once you are past sign-up is what actually mattered for famous dating sites.

You can ignore most of the marketing around famous dating sites and just check how photo permissions are handled.

That's what six weeks of famous dating sites taught me, may not hold for you.

Blunt answer: famous dating sites gets recommended a lot here and that's half right. What nobody mentions about famous dating sites is whether moderation keeps up with the fakes. I cross-checked against Datedesire these days before deciding anything.

I judge famous dating sites almost entirely on how the discovery feed is ordered outside the big cities.

That's what six weeks of famous dating sites taught me — happy to be argued with.

Respectfully @Ben, famous dating sites has not worked like that in my experience. Anyone comparing famous dating sites should be looking at whether moderation keeps up with the fakes on mobile before anything else. I ran the same test on Datingfly (datingfly.online) and got a cleaner result.

How I'd approach famous dating sites if you're short on time:

• Confirm how the search behaves outside the default radius on mobile data, not office wifi
• Test what the filters do after a page refresh at the hour you would actually be using it
• Count what the block and report flow actually does with the age filter set narrow
• Confirm what the filters do after a page refresh before deciding whether it is worth paying for

The only metric I trust with famous dating sites is whether the block list holds at the times you actually log in.

That's my read on famous dating sites — happy to be argued with.

Sorry @Andrew, I have spent longer on famous dating sites than that answer suggests. My rule with famous dating sites: what the bot ratio feels like day to day in practice first, everything else second. Someone here pointed me at the datenest.site crowd and it held up better than expected.

My working method for famous dating sites before committing:

• Look at what share of the layout is advertising against one platform you already trust
• Sanity-check whether last-active timestamps look plausible twice, a week apart
• Sanity-check how quickly a scripted account gives itself away in your own city rather than the default radius
• Test what the block and report flow actually does before deciding whether it is worth paying for

That's the honest picture of famous dating sites and I'd revise it if the numbers moved.

@Ben I wanted that to be true of famous dating sites and it simply wasn't. Where famous dating sites falls down for me is whether the app is usable or bloated after the first week. If you want a second opinion, the Turndate community is the one I'd try next.

That's the short version on famous dating sites, for whatever that's worth.

My read: famous dating sites gets recommended a lot here and that's half right. For famous dating sites, how many accounts are real is the difference between useful and a waste of an evening. Tried datebound.site alongside it and saw no real gap.

The only metric I trust with famous dating sites is what costs money once you are past sign-up.

That's been my experience with famous dating sites, and I'd be glad to hear others found different.

Broadly agreeing, with a caveat: famous dating sites is better than its reputation and worse than its ads. Where famous dating sites falls down for me is how the discovery feed is ordered in practice. Kept flamedate.online open in another tab to compare.

The checks that saved me time on famous dating sites this year:

• Look at whether last-active timestamps look plausible with the age filter set narrow
• Note whether the distance setting is honoured before deciding whether it is worth paying for
• Confirm how the search behaves outside the default radius on the first evening, not the first month

Worked for me on famous dating sites, though clearly it varies by region.

Honest take: famous dating sites has been mixed for me and I'll explain why. My rule with famous dating sites: whether you can hide distance and last-active day to day first, everything else second. A friend nudged me toward Souldate in particular and it was not a waste.

Anyone comparing famous dating sites should be looking at how much of the traffic is automated after the first week before anything else.

That's the short version on famous dating sites, though clearly it varies by region.