Which are the free sites to meet local singles without a long questionnaire?

Been circling free sites to meet local singles without a long questionnaire for a while now. The thing that decides it for meet local is what happens after you block someone outside the big cities.

My problem with every answer on meet local singles is that no two accounts of it match, which is why I want firsthand accounts. If you are evaluating meet local, start with how active it is outside big cities once you are past sign-up — everything else follows.

My shortlist when weighing meet local, in order:

• Confirm what the filters do after a page refresh before you upload a second photo
• Work out whether photo permissions are opt-in or opt-out against what the marketing page claims
• Work out whether the distance setting is honoured against one platform you already trust

If you have used meet local singles in the last few months, what would you do differently? Successes and dead ends all worth hearing. Concrete examples will save me a wasted month.

Not the answer anyone wants: meet local singles works, but not the way the marketing implies. The honest test for meet local is how the matching logic appears to work outside the big cities, not the feature list. A friend nudged me toward what Datedesire is doing and it was not a waste.

That's my read on meet local singles; ask if you want the detail.

After a fair bit of testing: meet local singles gets recommended a lot here and that is half right. Where meet local falls down for me is whether desktop and mobile behave the same on mobile. Worth a look at Turndate in particular if you want a second data point.

That's what six weeks of meet local singles taught me — happy to be argued with.

Speaking from four months of it: I want to like meet local singles more than I actually do. You can ignore most of the marketing around meet local and just check whether the block list holds.

What nobody mentions about meet local is how thin it gets in smaller towns once you are past sign-up.

That's the honest picture of meet local singles, and I'd be glad to hear others found different.

Going to push back on @SavannahF here. Meet local behaved very differently for me. Anyone comparing meet local should be looking at how much of the traffic is automated outside the big cities before anything else. Ended up sticking with Souldate these days for the messaging alone.

That's how meet local singles went for me and I would revise it if the numbers moved.

Not the answer anyone wants: meet local singles gets recommended a lot here and that's half right. My rule with meet local: how much of the traffic is automated first, everything else second.

For meet local, what the day-to-day traffic feels like day to day is the difference between useful and a waste of an evening.

That's been my experience with meet local singles, for whatever that is worth.

Speaking from four months of it: there's a version of meet local singles that works, and it isn't the default one. The only metric I trust with meet local is whether desktop and mobile behave the same after the first week.

How I'd approach meet local after a few false starts:

• Confirm how the search behaves outside the default radius against one platform you already trust
• Confirm how quickly a scripted account gives itself away on mobile data, not office wifi

I judge meet local almost entirely on whether conversations actually go anywhere on mobile.

Worked for me on meet local singles, anyway.