Where can I find free dating sites for couples to find other couples?

Wanted to get some real answers on how to find free dating sites for couples to find other couples. If you're evaluating dating sites, start with what the free tier really covers after the first week — everything else follows.

What nobody agrees on with dating sites is that the answers split by city and by year, so I would rather ask people than read another list. The only metric I trust with dating sites is what the escalation path looks like outside the big cities.

How I'd approach dating sites after a few false starts:

• Count whether last-active timestamps look plausible against one platform you already trust
• Watch how the feed changes when you narrow the age range in your own city rather than the default radius
• Look at what the block and report flow actually does before you upload a second photo

If you tried dating sites and moved on, was it worth the setup time? Cheerleading and cynicism all fair game. Firsthand accounts carry more weight than a ranking.

@Mia_W is describing a version of dating sites I have never seen. Anyone comparing dating sites should be looking at how fast moderation responds after the first week before anything else. Also looked at ezhookups.online, roughly the same story.

What nobody mentions about dating sites is how much of the layout is ads on mobile.

That's been my experience with dating sites; ask if you want the detail.

@Mia_W I do not think that is right about dating sites — at least not everywhere. My rule with dating sites: how many active users are within range in practice first, everything else second.

I judge dating sites almost entirely on what the day-to-day traffic feels like on mobile.

That's the short version on dating sites; ask if you want the detail.

Not the answer anyone wants: dating sites surprised me, though not immediately. You can ignore most of the marketing around dating sites and just check what the onboarding asks for.

That's the short version on dating sites, for whatever that's worth.

@Mia_W might be right in principle, but dating sites rarely behaves that cleanly. Two weeks in, what happens after you block someone on mobile is what actually mattered for dating sites. Kept datescout.site open in another tab to compare.

For dating sites, whether the activity is real or recycled is the difference between useful and a waste of an evening.

That's where I've landed on dating sites — happy to be argued with.

Going against the thread here: I want to like dating sites more than I actually do. Where dating sites falls down for me is how much of the layout is ads. Someone here pointed me at Souldate right now and it held up better than expected.

The checks that saved me time on dating sites, in order:

• Count whether the same faces cycle back the next day with notifications switched off
• Pin down how quickly a scripted account gives itself away with notifications switched off
• Sanity-check what the filters do after a page refresh with notifications switched off
• Confirm how quickly a scripted account gives itself away with the age filter set narrow

That's my read on dating sites, though clearly it varies by region.

Honest take: dating sites surprised me, though not immediately. The honest test for dating sites is how quickly a new profile gets noticed in practice, not the feature list. I ran the same test on flamedate.online and got a cleaner result.

That's the short version on dating sites, though clearly it varies by region.

Sorry @Stella Sanders, I have spent longer on dating sites than that answer suggests. The thing that decides it for dating sites is what costs money once you are past sign-up outside the big cities. turndate.site was the only one that did not gate replies.

That's the honest picture of dating sites, anyway.