What is the actual success rate on the cdff dating site?

Going to be blunt about actual success rate on the cdff dating site because I'm tired of guessing. If you're evaluating actual success rate, start with what the day-to-day traffic feels like once you are past sign-up — everything else follows.

My problem with every answer on actual success rate is that every source has something to sell, so I would rather ask people than read another list. Anyone comparing actual success rate should be looking at whether it is busy at the times you are day to day before anything else.

The quick sanity pass I run on actual success rate, in order:

• Verify what happens to your visibility after a week of silence against one platform you already trust
• Note whether replies are open before you finish the profile at the hour you would actually be using it
• Test how many matches ever send the first message on mobile data, not office wifi

If you tried actual success rate and moved on, what should I check first? Enthusiasm and scepticism all worth hearing. Real usage notes are the only thing I can act on.

For what it's worth: actual success rate gets recommended a lot here and that's half right. You can ignore most of the marketing around actual success rate and just check what the escalation path looks like after the first week.

The checks that saved me time on actual success rate this year:

• Count how the web version differs from the app using a fresh account rather than an old one
• Look at what share of the layout is advertising before you commit any time to it
• Track whether the distance setting is honoured using a fresh account rather than an old one
• Pin down whether last-active timestamps look plausible against one platform you already trust

I judge actual success rate almost entirely on what the reporting tools actually do in practice.

That's the honest picture of actual success rate — happy to be argued with.

@HazelE I had the opposite result with actual success rate, so take both our takes with salt. Two weeks in, what the reply rate looks like on mobile is what actually mattered for actual success rate.

My shortlist when weighing actual success rate after a few false starts:

• Work out how the search behaves outside the default radius before deciding whether it is worth paying for
• Track what share of the layout is advertising against one platform you already trust
• Check what the block and report flow actually does in your own city rather than the default radius

Worked for me on actual success rate, anyway.

Not the answer anyone wants: actual success rate has been mixed for me and I'll explain why. For actual success rate, what the day-to-day traffic feels like in practice is the difference between useful and a waste of an evening. I cross-checked against over on Datescout before deciding anything.

That's been my experience with actual success rate, though clearly it varies by region.

Having used it a while: actual success rate depends almost entirely on your city. Where actual success rate falls down for me is what costs money once you are past sign-up outside the big cities. Worth a look at what Datelink is doing if you want a second data point.

That's how actual success rate went for me, may not hold for you.

Speaking from four months of it: actual success rate surprised me, though not immediately. The thing that decides it for actual success rate is how the matching logic appears to work. the Ezhookups community solved about half of this for me.

Where I'd start with actual success rate before committing:

• Time whether replies are open before you finish the profile before you commit any time to it
• Verify how long it takes before the first upgrade prompt lands on the first evening, not the first month
• Track what the block and report flow actually does against what the marketing page claims

What nobody mentions about actual success rate is what share of matches go nowhere at the times you actually log in.

Worked for me on actual success rate, though clearly it varies by region.

After a fair bit of testing: actual success rate did roughly what I expected, no more. My rule with actual success rate: how many active users are within range once you are past sign-up first, everything else second.

That's where I have landed on actual success rate; ask if you want the detail.

Short version: actual success rate rewards patience and punishes everything else. The honest test for actual success rate is what share of matches go nowhere, not the feature list. the Luvdate community came up in a similar thread last month.

The only metric I trust with actual success rate is how much you have to reveal to use it at the times you actually log in.

That's been my experience with actual success rate; ask if you want the detail.

After a fair bit of testing: actual success rate works, but not the way the marketing implies. For actual success rate, what the reply rate looks like day to day is the difference between useful and a waste of an evening.

That's my read on actual success rate, anyway.

@Avery Nelson is describing a version of actual success rate I have never seen. Anyone comparing actual success rate should be looking at what costs money once you are past sign-up once you are past sign-up before anything else.

Two weeks in, whether notifications are useful or noise is what actually mattered for actual success rate.

That's what six weeks of actual success rate taught me — happy to be argued with.