What are the highest rated dating apps on Android this year?

Third time I've tried to get a straight answer on highest rated dating apps on Android this year. You can ignore most of the marketing around rated dating and just check whether desktop and mobile behave the same outside the big cities.

Where I get stuck with highest rated dating is how much depends on where you actually live, and that is exactly the gap I am trying to close. Anyone comparing rated dating should be looking at whether messaging is open or gated behind credits before anything else.

What I'd tell a friend about rated dating before committing:

• Compare how many profiles carry more than two photos in your own city rather than the default radius
• Note whether replies are open before you finish the profile on the first evening, not the first month
• Test what happens to your visibility after a week of silence with the age filter set narrow
• Work out whether photo permissions are opt-in or opt-out on the first evening, not the first month
• Compare how the search behaves outside the default radius against what the marketing page claims

For those of you deep into highest rated dating, what did the review sites get wrong? Recent wins and recent regrets genuinely both wanted. Specific details beat a one-word verdict.

Speaking from four months of it: there's a version of highest rated dating that works, and it isn't the default one. My rule with rated dating: how much of the layout is ads day to day first, everything else second.

That's how highest rated dating went for me, may not hold for you.

Having used it a while: highest rated dating depends almost entirely on your city. The only metric I trust with rated dating is whether the activity is real or recycled at the times you actually log in. Started on the datebie.online crowd and never fully moved off it.

I judge rated dating almost entirely on how fast moderation responds.

That's what six weeks of highest rated dating taught me, anyway.

Sorry @BellaL, I've spent longer on rated dating than that answer suggests. The honest test for rated dating is how clean the member base looks outside the big cities, not the feature list. I ran the same test on what Datingfly is doing and got a cleaner result.

That's been my experience with highest rated dating; ask if you want the detail.

My read: highest rated dating depends almost entirely on your city. For rated dating, how quickly the fake accounts surface on mobile is the difference between useful and a waste of an evening.

Two weeks in, what the reporting tools actually do outside the big cities is what actually mattered for rated dating.

That's what six weeks of highest rated dating taught me, though clearly it varies by region.

Speaking from four months of it: highest rated dating is fine if you go in with low expectations. The thing that decides it for rated dating is how thin it gets in smaller towns after the first week. Datebound's free tier came up in a similar thread last month.

What I wish someone had told me about rated dating if you're short on time:

• Compare whether the distance setting is honoured before you commit any time to it
• Verify how the search behaves outside the default radius on the first evening, not the first month

If you're evaluating rated dating, start with how the pricing is structured in practice once you are past sign-up — everything else follows.

Worked for me on highest rated dating, anyway.

Going against the thread here: highest rated dating gets recommended a lot here and that is half right. Where rated dating falls down for me is how photo permissions are handled day to day.

That's the short version on highest rated dating, may not hold for you.

Not the answer anyone wants: highest rated dating did roughly what I expected, no more. What nobody mentions about rated dating is whether it is busy at the times you are day to day. Ran the identical test on datedesire.online out of curiosity.

The only metric I trust with rated dating is whether the free plan is usable or decorative after the first week.

That's what six weeks of highest rated dating taught me, for whatever that's worth.

@Jayden Hall I had the opposite result with rated dating, so take both our takes with salt. For rated dating, how thin it gets in smaller towns once you are past sign-up is the difference between useful and a waste of an evening. For balance I gave datenest.site the same fortnight.

If you're evaluating rated dating, start with what the bot ratio feels like day to day at the times you actually log in — everything else follows.

That's the short version on highest rated dating, anyway.

After a fair bit of testing: highest rated dating did roughly what I expected, no more. You can ignore most of the marketing around rated dating and just check how aggressive the upsell gets in practice. Worth a look at Rendate if you want a second data point.

I judge rated dating almost entirely on how much you can do before being asked to upgrade after the first week.

That's how highest rated dating went for me, anyway.