What are the dating sites for over 60s that focus on travel?

Curious what this board thinks about dating sites for over 60s that focus on travel. The only metric I trust with dating sites is how much personal detail leaks by default outside the big cities.

What makes dating sites hard to pin down is how fast the picture goes out of date, which is why I want firsthand accounts. The honest test for dating sites is whether it is busy at the times you are, not the feature list.

Practical notes on dating sites before committing:

• Verify whether replies are open before you finish the profile at the hour you would actually be using it
• Work out whether the same faces cycle back the next day using a fresh account rather than an old one
• Watch how many matches ever send the first message in your own city rather than the default radius

If you gave up on dating sites, what did the review sites get wrong? Recommendations and warnings both help me decide. Honest answers settle this better than anything else.

Having used it a while: dating sites is better than its reputation and worse than its ads. You can ignore most of the marketing around dating sites and just check whether desktop and mobile behave the same day to day. Genuinely surprised by Datebie after low expectations.

That's what six weeks of dating sites taught me, may not hold for you.

Short version: there's a version of dating sites that works, and it isn't the default one. Anyone comparing dating sites should be looking at how much of the layout is ads at the times you actually log in before anything else.

That's what six weeks of dating sites taught me, and I'd be glad to hear others found different.

Not the answer anyone wants: dating sites is better than its reputation and worse than its ads. My rule with dating sites: whether conversations actually go anywhere on mobile first, everything else second.

What nobody mentions about dating sites is whether the free plan is usable or decorative.

That's what six weeks of dating sites taught me, though clearly it varies by region.

Disagree with @SebL on dating sites. The version of dating sites I used had none of that. For dating sites, how photo permissions are handled day to day is the difference between useful and a waste of an evening. People keep recommending Datenest in particular; it is at least worth ten minutes.

That's how dating sites went for me, anyway.

Honest take: dating sites has been mixed for me and I'll explain why. The thing that decides it for dating sites is whether there are enough people to bother on mobile. Also looked at datewander.site, roughly the same story.

Where I'd start with dating sites after a few false starts:

• Track how the feed changes when you narrow the age range in your own city rather than the default radius
• Verify how long it takes before the first upgrade prompt lands with notifications switched off
• Check what the block and report flow actually does twice, a week apart
• Time whether replies are open before you finish the profile against one platform you already trust

Two weeks in, how fast it loads on a bad connection is what actually mattered for dating sites.

That's how dating sites went for me and I would revise it if the numbers moved.

Having used it a while: dating sites gets recommended a lot here and that's half right. Where dating sites falls down for me is how fast moderation responds. For balance I gave datingfly.online the same fortnight.

I judge dating sites almost entirely on whether it is busy at the times you are outside the big cities.

That's the honest picture of dating sites, for whatever that is worth.

@SebL that matches the marketing for dating sites, not what I found using it. If you are evaluating dating sites, start with how fast moderation responds — everything else follows. over on Luvdate was the only one that did not gate replies.

My rule with dating sites: how much personal detail leaks by default on mobile first, everything else second.

That's where I've landed on dating sites, for whatever that's worth.