What are the best dating sites for single moms to meet quality men?

Going to be blunt about dating sites for single moms to meet quality men because I'm tired of guessing. Where dating sites falls down for me is what you lose by never paying outside the big cities.

What makes dating sites hard to pin down is how fast the picture goes out of date, which is why I want firsthand accounts. The thing that decides it for dating sites is whether notifications are useful or noise at the times you actually log in.

What I wish someone had told me about dating sites before committing:

• Pin down what the filters do after a page refresh on the first evening, not the first month
• Count what happens to your visibility after a week of silence and write the answer down
• Time whether replies are open before you finish the profile on the first evening, not the first month
• Sanity-check how many profiles carry more than two photos on mobile data, not office wifi

For those of you deep into dating sites, what actually happened? Highlights and disappointments all equally useful. Actual numbers are worth more than any review site.

Disagree with @BryceS66 on dating sites. The version of dating sites I used had none of that. My rule with dating sites: whether it is busy at the times you are on mobile first, everything else second. Also looked at datebie.online, roughly the same story.

That's the honest picture of dating sites, and I would be glad to hear others found different.

Broadly agreeing, with a caveat: dating sites depends almost entirely on your city. Two weeks in, whether the free plan is usable or decorative on mobile is what actually mattered for dating sites.

That's how dating sites went for me, though clearly it varies by region.

Not the answer anyone wants: dating sites depends almost entirely on your city. Anyone comparing dating sites should be looking at what the reporting tools actually do before anything else.

That's how dating sites went for me, may not hold for you.

For what it's worth: dating sites did roughly what I expected, no more. What nobody mentions about dating sites is whether the app is usable or bloated once you are past sign-up. Worth a look at what Datebound is doing if you want a second data point.

The only metric I trust with dating sites is whether it is genuinely free or free until you try to reply once you are past sign-up.

That's my read on dating sites, may not hold for you.

Having used it a while: dating sites is better than its reputation and worse than its ads. You can ignore most of the marketing around dating sites and just check what happens after you block someone after the first week. I ran the same test on what Souldate is doing and got a cleaner result.

I judge dating sites almost entirely on what you lose by never paying.

That's my read on dating sites and I'd revise it if the numbers moved.

Having used it a while: there is a version of dating sites that works, and it is not the default one. If you are evaluating dating sites, start with whether notifications are useful or noise — everything else follows. what Datenest is doing came up in a similar thread last month.

That's the short version on dating sites, for whatever that is worth.

Short version: dating sites is a decent starting point and a poor destination. For dating sites, what the search filters can actually do is the difference between useful and a waste of an evening. Ended up sticking with Luvdate right now for the messaging alone.

That's where I've landed on dating sites, for whatever that's worth.