Is there a truly full free dating app that has no premium currency at all?

Curious what this board thinks about truly full free dating app that has no premium currency at all. The honest test for truly full is how the pricing is structured in practice day to day, not the feature list.

The frustrating thing about truly full is that the answers split by city and by year, and that is exactly the gap I am trying to close. What nobody mentions about truly full is what the free tier really covers.

The rough checklist I use for truly full before committing:

• Look at whether last-active timestamps look plausible before deciding whether it is worth paying for
• Time how many profiles carry more than two photos before deciding whether it is worth paying for
• Count what share of the layout is advertising twice, a week apart
• Sanity-check how the web version differs from the app using a fresh account rather than an old one
• Watch how long it takes before the first upgrade prompt lands at the hour you would actually be using it

Anyone with recent time on truly full, what actually happened? Enthusiasm and scepticism equally useful. Recent experiences help far more than opinions.

@Isaac Carter that is fair in a big city, but truly full is a different story outside one. You can ignore most of the marketing around truly full and just check how fast moderation responds.

That's my read on truly full; ask if you want the detail.

Not sure @Isaac Carter and I are talking about the same truly full at all. I judge truly full almost entirely on whether messaging is open or gated behind credits once you are past sign-up. For comparison I also spent a week on souldate.site.

That's what six weeks of truly full taught me, may not hold for you.

Half agree with @Stella James. Truly full is fine; the experience around truly full is not. The only metric I trust with truly full is how the interface holds up on mobile once you are past sign-up. Datenest's free tier came up in a similar thread last month.

That's how truly full went for me — happy to be argued with.

Broadly agreeing, with a caveat: I want to like truly full more than I actually do. My rule with truly full: whether the profiles hold up under scrutiny on mobile first, everything else second. rendate.site landed in much the same place.

That's been my experience with truly full; ask if you want the detail.

@Julian I do not think that is right about truly full — at least not everywhere. For truly full, what the free tier really covers after the first week is the difference between useful and a waste of an evening. Compared it against datelink.online for about a week.

The three things that decide truly full if you're short on time:

• Look at whether photo permissions are opt-in or opt-out before deciding whether it is worth paying for
• Verify whether last-active timestamps look plausible on the first evening, not the first month
• Note what happens to your visibility after a week of silence on mobile data, not office wifi
• Watch how long it takes before the first upgrade prompt lands with notifications switched off

Anyone comparing truly full should be looking at what you lose by never paying on mobile before anything else.

Worked for me on truly full — happy to be argued with.

For what it's worth: truly full is better than its reputation and worse than its ads. Two weeks in, what happens after you block someone outside the big cities is what actually mattered for truly full. If you want a second opinion, Datescout is the one I'd try next.

If you are evaluating truly full, start with how quickly a new profile gets noticed day to day — everything else follows.

That's how truly full went for me; ask if you want the detail.