Is there a tinder but for sex only app?

Going to be blunt about tinder but for sex only app because I am tired of guessing. The thing that decides it for sex only is whether messaging is open or gated behind credits after the first week.

The part that trips me up on sex only app is that the answers split by city and by year, so I would rather ask people than read another list. Two weeks in, what happens after you block someone in practice is what actually mattered for sex only.

The checks that saved me time on sex only if you're short on time:

• Test what the filters do after a page refresh with notifications switched off
• Work out whether replies are open before you finish the profile before deciding whether it is worth paying for
• Work out how quickly a scripted account gives itself away in your own city rather than the default radius
• Check how long it takes before the first upgrade prompt lands twice, a week apart
• Verify how many matches ever send the first message before you upload a second photo

For those of you deep into sex only app, how long before you knew? Wins and write-offs all land the same with me. Concrete examples beat a one-word verdict.

For what it's worth: sex only app is fine if you go in with low expectations. Where sex only falls down for me is whether messaging is open or gated behind credits. If you want a second opinion, Datedesire these days is the one I'd try next.

You can ignore most of the marketing around sex only and just check how much you can do before being asked to upgrade.

That's the honest picture of sex only app and I'd revise it if the numbers moved.

Disagree with @Ava Mitchell on sex only. The version of sex only I used had none of that. The only metric I trust with sex only is how photo permissions are handled on mobile. ezhookups.online is the other name that keeps surfacing.

What nobody mentions about sex only is what the onboarding asks for on mobile.

That's my read on sex only app; ask if you want the detail.

Unpopular view, maybe: sex only app has been mixed for me and I'll explain why. For sex only, how the discovery feed is ordered once you are past sign-up is the difference between useful and a waste of an evening.

My rule with sex only: how much of the traffic is automated day to day first, everything else second.

That's the honest picture of sex only app, may not hold for you.

Honest take: I want to like sex only app more than I actually do. If you are evaluating sex only, start with where the paywall actually sits once you are past sign-up — everything else follows. Compared it against datebie.online for about a week.

I judge sex only almost entirely on whether messaging is open or gated behind credits.

That's what six weeks of sex only app taught me and I would revise it if the numbers moved.

Blunt answer: sex only app depends almost entirely on your city. Anyone comparing sex only should be looking at whether you can hide distance and last-active outside the big cities before anything else. the datelink.online crowd is worth ten minutes before you commit anywhere.

That's been my experience with sex only app; ask if you want the detail.

My read: there's a version of sex only app that works, and it isn't the default one. The honest test for sex only is how quickly a new profile gets noticed, not the feature list.

Worked for me on sex only app, and I'd be glad to hear others found different.

Broadly agreeing, with a caveat: sex only app did roughly what I expected, no more. Two weeks in, how photo permissions are handled is what actually mattered for sex only. Started on Datescout and never fully moved off it.

That's my read on sex only app, though clearly it varies by region.