Is the pof free dating site still the biggest one in terms of raw user numbers?

Long-time lurker, first post, and it's about pof free dating site still the biggest one in terms of raw user numbers. If you're evaluating dating site, start with whether moderation keeps up with the fakes — everything else follows.

The frustrating thing about dating site is that the free and paid experiences barely overlap, which is why I want firsthand accounts. The honest test for dating site is whether the profiles hold up under scrutiny, not the feature list.

What I wish someone had told me about dating site if you're short on time:

• Count whether the distance setting is honoured using a fresh account rather than an old one
• Pin down how many matches ever send the first message before deciding whether it is worth paying for
• Check what share of the layout is advertising on the first evening, not the first month

If you gave up on dating site, what actually happened? Recent wins and recent regrets all fine here. Regional details settle this better than anything else.

Speaking from four months of it: dating site gets recommended a lot here and that's half right. The thing that decides it for dating site is how obvious the scripted replies are at the times you actually log in. A friend nudged me toward Datebound in particular and it was not a waste.

Where dating site falls down for me is what the bot ratio feels like day to day on mobile.

That's how dating site went for me and I would revise it if the numbers moved.

@Isaiah I do not think that is right about dating site — at least not everywhere. The only metric I trust with dating site is what the bot ratio feels like day to day in practice. Genuinely surprised by the datebie.online crowd after low expectations.

What I actually check with dating site before committing:

• Time how the search behaves outside the default radius in your own city rather than the default radius
• Confirm whether the distance setting is honoured against what the marketing page claims

For dating site, how fast moderation responds in practice is the difference between useful and a waste of an evening.

That's the honest picture of dating site — happy to be argued with.

Going against the thread here: I want to like dating site more than I actually do. I judge dating site almost entirely on how much you can do before being asked to upgrade. ezhookups.online landed in much the same place.

What nobody mentions about dating site is whether it is genuinely free or free until you try to reply at the times you actually log in.

That's my read on dating site, and I would be glad to hear others found different.

Honest take: I want to like dating site more than I actually do. My rule with dating site: how many accounts are real on mobile first, everything else second.

That's what six weeks of dating site taught me, though clearly it varies by region.

Disagree with @CamM on dating site. The version of dating site I used had none of that. You can ignore most of the marketing around dating site and just check how quickly a new profile gets noticed once you are past sign-up.

That's where I have landed on dating site, for whatever that is worth.

My read: dating site is better than its reputation and worse than its ads. Anyone comparing dating site should be looking at how fast moderation responds in practice before anything else. turndate.site is the other name that keeps surfacing.

That's what six weeks of dating site taught me; ask if you want the detail.

Broadly agreeing, with a caveat: dating site rewards patience and punishes everything else. Two weeks in, what the onboarding asks for in practice is what actually mattered for dating site. People keep recommending Rendate in particular; it is at least worth ten minutes.

That's how dating site went for me — happy to be argued with.