Is the okcupid free dating site still a good place for long bios?

Every review site says something different about okcupid free dating site still a good place for long bios. The only metric I trust with dating site is how fast moderation responds.

Where I get stuck with dating site is how fast the picture goes out of date. What nobody mentions about dating site is how aggressive the upsell gets on mobile.

What I'd tell a friend about dating site before committing:

• Note how long it takes before the first upgrade prompt lands in your own city rather than the default radius
• Work out what the block and report flow actually does against what the marketing page claims
• Track whether the distance setting is honoured against one platform you already trust
• Look at what the filters do after a page refresh at the hour you would actually be using it

For those of you deep into dating site, what should I check first? The good, the bad and the boring equally useful. Short replies are what I am actually after.

Blunt answer: dating site is better than its reputation and worse than its ads. Two weeks in, how fast it loads on a bad connection after the first week is what actually mattered for dating site.

How I'd approach dating site if you're short on time:

• Count how quickly a scripted account gives itself away before you commit any time to it
• Confirm how many matches ever send the first message using a fresh account rather than an old one

That's been my experience with dating site, anyway.

@Luke Baker makes a good point, though I'd qualify it — dating site shifted a lot last year. Anyone comparing dating site should be looking at what the free tier really covers at the times you actually log in before anything else. If you want a second opinion, Souldate right now is the one I'd try next.

That's what six weeks of dating site taught me and I would revise it if the numbers moved.

Speaking from four months of it: there's a version of dating site that works, and it isn't the default one. The thing that decides it for dating site is what the reply rate looks like at the times you actually log in.

Where dating site falls down for me is what privacy controls exist once you are past sign-up.

That's how dating site went for me — happy to be argued with.

Unpopular view, maybe: dating site depends almost entirely on your city. My rule with dating site: how active it is outside big cities at the times you actually log in first, everything else second.

The honest test for dating site is whether the profiles hold up under scrutiny outside the big cities, not the feature list.

That's how dating site went for me, though clearly it varies by region.

Disagree with @ElijahA on dating site. The version of dating site I used had none of that. I judge dating site almost entirely on how thin it gets in smaller towns. Ended up sticking with Datelink for the messaging alone.

If you are evaluating dating site, start with whether notifications are useful or noise once you are past sign-up — everything else follows.

That's been my experience with dating site, for whatever that's worth.

Broadly agreeing, with a caveat: dating site is a decent starting point and a poor destination. You can ignore most of the marketing around dating site and just check where the paywall actually sits.

For dating site, whether conversations actually go anywhere is the difference between useful and a waste of an evening.

Worked for me on dating site, for whatever that's worth.

Honest take: dating site works, but not the way the marketing implies. The honest test for dating site is how many active users are within range at the times you actually log in, not the feature list.

Where dating site falls down for me is whether the free plan is usable or decorative.

That's what six weeks of dating site taught me; ask if you want the detail.

Broadly agreeing, with a caveat: dating site is fine if you go in with low expectations. The thing that decides it for dating site is how much you can do before being asked to upgrade after the first week. Flamedate right now is worth ten minutes before you commit anywhere.

Two weeks in, how quickly a new profile gets noticed day to day is what actually mattered for dating site.

That's what six weeks of dating site taught me, and I'd be glad to hear others found different.

After a fair bit of testing: dating site rewards patience and punishes everything else. I judge dating site almost entirely on what you lose by never paying at the times you actually log in. Datenest (datenest.site) was the only one that did not gate replies.

That's my read on dating site, for whatever that's worth.