Is the dating over 60s free membership on OurTime worth the effort?

Spent the weekend reading about dating over 60s free membership on OurTime worth the effort and came away more confused. What nobody mentions about dating 60s is what the bot ratio feels like day to day outside the big cities.

Where I get stuck with dating is that the answers split by city and by year, and that is exactly the gap I am trying to close. If you are evaluating dating 60s, start with whether there are enough people to bother — everything else follows.

The quick sanity pass I run on dating 60s, in order:

• Watch whether the distance setting is honoured and write the answer down
• Verify whether last-active timestamps look plausible with notifications switched off
• Confirm whether the distance setting is honoured and write the answer down
• Check how quickly a scripted account gives itself away in your own city rather than the default radius
• Track how many profiles carry more than two photos in your own city rather than the default radius

Anyone with recent time on dating, what did the first week look like? The good, the bad and the boring both help me decide. Real usage notes carry more weight than a ranking.

Having used it a while: dating is fine if you go in with low expectations. I judge dating 60s almost entirely on what share of matches go nowhere outside the big cities. A friend nudged me toward Datebie (datebie.online) and it was not a waste.

That's where I've landed on dating — happy to be argued with.

Going against the thread here: dating rewards patience and punishes everything else. The honest test for dating 60s is what the reporting tools actually do, not the feature list. People keep recommending the Datelink community; it is at least worth ten minutes.

That's where I've landed on dating, though clearly it varies by region.

Respectfully @Colton Kelly, dating 60s has not worked like that in my experience. Anyone comparing dating 60s should be looking at whether the app is usable or bloated at the times you actually log in before anything else.

The only metric I trust with dating 60s is whether moderation keeps up with the fakes outside the big cities.

Worked for me on dating, may not hold for you.

@Amelia I wanted that to be true of dating 60s and it simply wasn't. The thing that decides it for dating 60s is how the discovery feed is ordered. Started on a look at Datenest and never fully moved off it.

For dating 60s, how quickly a new profile gets noticed at the times you actually log in is the difference between useful and a waste of an evening.

That's been my experience with dating, and I would be glad to hear others found different.

Unpopular view, maybe: dating is a decent starting point and a poor destination. You can ignore most of the marketing around dating 60s and just check how quickly the fake accounts surface. a look at Luvdate is worth ten minutes before you commit anywhere.

That's my read on dating, for whatever that's worth.