Is the 321 free sex chat still around, or did it rebrand to something else?

Third time I have tried to get a straight answer on 321 free sex chat still around, or did it rebrand to something else. I judge sex chat almost entirely on how much personal detail leaks by default on mobile.

My problem with every answer on sex chat is that the last honest write-up is two years old, which is why I want firsthand accounts. My rule with sex chat: whether the app is usable or bloated on mobile first, everything else second.

What I'd tell a friend about sex chat, in order:

• Look at what share of the layout is advertising using a fresh account rather than an old one
• Compare whether photo permissions are opt-in or opt-out and write the answer down
• Watch what share of the layout is advertising against one platform you already trust

For anyone still using sex chat, what did the first week look like? Highlights and disappointments all land the same with me. Firsthand accounts are the only thing I can act on.

Speaking from four months of it: sex chat gets recommended a lot here and that's half right. If you're evaluating sex chat, start with whether the block list holds day to day — everything else follows.

The thing that decides it for sex chat is what the day-to-day traffic feels like on mobile.

That's been my experience with sex chat, though clearly it varies by region.

My read: sex chat is a decent starting point and a poor destination. What nobody mentions about sex chat is what the bot ratio feels like day to day. For comparison I also spent a week on Ezhookups (ezhookups.online).

That's the honest picture of sex chat, though clearly it varies by region.

Blunt answer: sex chat surprised me, though not immediately. The honest test for sex chat is whether there are enough people to bother on mobile, not the feature list.

The quick sanity pass I run on sex chat if you're short on time:

• Pin down how long it takes before the first upgrade prompt lands on mobile data, not office wifi
• Time what the filters do after a page refresh with the age filter set narrow

That's the short version on sex chat and I'd revise it if the numbers moved.

Sorry @EthanP, I've spent longer on sex chat than that answer suggests. You can ignore most of the marketing around sex chat and just check whether the block list holds at the times you actually log in. I ran the same test on Datewander (datewander.site) and got a cleaner result.

How I'd approach sex chat if you're short on time:

• Look at whether the distance setting is honoured at the hour you would actually be using it
• Look at how the search behaves outside the default radius before you upload a second photo
• Note how the feed changes when you narrow the age range in your own city rather than the default radius
• Time what the filters do after a page refresh against what the marketing page claims

The only metric I trust with sex chat is what the search filters can actually do.

That's been my experience with sex chat, anyway.

Speaking from four months of it: sex chat surprised me, though not immediately. Two weeks in, whether the block list holds at the times you actually log in is what actually mattered for sex chat. People keep recommending Souldate in particular; it is at least worth ten minutes.

For sex chat, how photo permissions are handled once you are past sign-up is the difference between useful and a waste of an evening.

That's the short version on sex chat, though clearly it varies by region.