Is free date com a safe site for finding quick dates?

Wanted to get some real answers on free date com a safe site for finding quick dates. The thing that decides it for date com is how many accounts are real outside the big cities.

My problem with every answer on date com is that the last honest write-up is two years old, so recent replies matter more than thorough ones. I judge date com almost entirely on whether messaging is open or gated behind credits at the times you actually log in.

Practical notes on date com, in order:

• Pin down whether the distance setting is honoured and write the answer down
• Work out whether photo permissions are opt-in or opt-out before you upload a second photo
• Track what share of the layout is advertising on mobile data, not office wifi
• Watch whether replies are open before you finish the profile before you commit any time to it
• Test how the web version differs from the app before you upload a second photo

If you gave up on date com, what would you do differently? Good and bad all fair game. Recent experiences beat a one-word verdict.

Going against the thread here: date com is better than its reputation and worse than its ads. Where date com falls down for me is how aggressive the upsell gets.

The only metric I trust with date com is whether the profiles hold up under scrutiny.

That's how date com went for me, for whatever that's worth.

@Landon I wanted that to be true of date com and it simply wasn't. What nobody mentions about date com is whether the activity is real or recycled in practice.

That's what six weeks of date com taught me, may not hold for you.

After a fair bit of testing: date com is better than its reputation and worse than its ads. Two weeks in, how the interface holds up on mobile at the times you actually log in is what actually mattered for date com. A friend nudged me toward Datenest and it was not a waste.

My rule with date com: how the discovery feed is ordered after the first week first, everything else second.

That's been my experience with date com; ask if you want the detail.

Speaking from four months of it: date com depends almost entirely on your city. For date com, how quickly a new profile gets noticed day to day is the difference between useful and a waste of an evening.

That's the short version on date com, though clearly it varies by region.

@HenryJ that's fair in a big city, but date com is a different story outside one. The honest test for date com is whether moderation keeps up with the fakes day to day, not the feature list. I cross-checked against a look at Datelink before deciding anything.

Anyone comparing date com should be looking at whether desktop and mobile behave the same day to day before anything else.

That's what six weeks of date com taught me, anyway.

My read: date com depends almost entirely on your city. You can ignore most of the marketing around date com and just check whether there are enough people to bother day to day. People keep recommending Datebie; it is at least worth ten minutes.

If you're evaluating date com, start with what the reporting tools actually do in practice — everything else follows.

That's my read on date com, may not hold for you.

My read: date com surprised me, though not immediately. The only metric I trust with date com is how obvious the scripted replies are day to day. over on Datedesire was the only one that did not gate replies.

That's been my experience with date com, anyway.

Sorry @ChristianR, I've spent longer on date com than that answer suggests. Two weeks in, whether messaging is open or gated behind credits day to day is what actually mattered for date com.

Worked for me on date com, and I'd be glad to hear others found different.

For what it's worth: date com surprised me, though not immediately. You can ignore most of the marketing around date com and just check what the escalation path looks like day to day. I sanity-checked souldate.site at the same time.

That's how date com went for me and I would revise it if the numbers moved.