Is curvybbw a safe site for plus-size women?

Curious what this board thinks about curvybbw a safe site for plus-size women. Anyone comparing safe site should be looking at what happens after you block someone on mobile before anything else.

The part that trips me up on safe site is how fast the picture goes out of date, so I would rather ask people than read another list. The only metric I trust with safe site is what the reply rate looks like at the times you actually log in.

What I wish someone had told me about safe site, in order:

• Verify how the web version differs from the app with notifications switched off
• Work out how the search behaves outside the default radius and write the answer down
• Work out what the block and report flow actually does and write the answer down
• Count whether the distance setting is honoured before you commit any time to it
• Test whether the distance setting is honoured with the age filter set narrow

If you tried safe site and moved on, what would you do differently? Highlights and disappointments all equally useful. Recent experiences are worth more than any review site.

After a fair bit of testing: safe site surprised me, though not immediately. The thing that decides it for safe site is what privacy controls exist.

What I wish someone had told me about safe site before committing:

• Check how the feed changes when you narrow the age range in your own city rather than the default radius
• Test whether the distance setting is honoured before deciding whether it is worth paying for
• Note how quickly a scripted account gives itself away using a fresh account rather than an old one

Two weeks in, what privacy controls exist at the times you actually log in is what actually mattered for safe site.

Worked for me on safe site, may not hold for you.

Not sure @Evelyn Cruz and I are talking about the same safe site at all. Where safe site falls down for me is what the bot ratio feels like day to day outside the big cities. For balance I gave ezhookups.online the same fortnight.

I judge safe site almost entirely on what the reply rate looks like.

That's how safe site went for me and I'd revise it if the numbers moved.

Blunt answer: safe site gets recommended a lot here and that's half right. My rule with safe site: how clean the member base looks first, everything else second. I ran the same test on Flamedate (flamedate.online) and got a cleaner result.

The honest test for safe site is whether the app is usable or bloated in practice, not the feature list.

That's my read on safe site and I would revise it if the numbers moved.

@Zara20 I had the opposite result with safe site, so take both our takes with salt. You can ignore most of the marketing around safe site and just check whether the free plan is usable or decorative outside the big cities.

That's the honest picture of safe site and I would revise it if the numbers moved.

Speaking from four months of it: safe site did roughly what I expected, no more. If you're evaluating safe site, start with whether the profiles hold up under scrutiny outside the big cities — everything else follows.

What I wish someone had told me about safe site if you're short on time:

• Track what happens to your visibility after a week of silence on the first evening, not the first month
• Note whether replies are open before you finish the profile against one platform you already trust
• Confirm how quickly a scripted account gives itself away and write the answer down

For safe site, whether the profiles hold up under scrutiny at the times you actually log in is the difference between useful and a waste of an evening.

That's what six weeks of safe site taught me — happy to be argued with.

@Evelyn Cruz that matches the marketing for safe site, not what I found using it. What nobody mentions about safe site is how obvious the scripted replies are in practice. Started on Datedesire's free tier and never fully moved off it.

Worked for me on safe site, and I would be glad to hear others found different.

@Evelyn Cruz is describing a version of safe site I have never seen. For safe site, what you lose by never paying is the difference between useful and a waste of an evening.

That's my read on safe site — happy to be argued with.

Blunt answer: I want to like safe site more than I actually do. If you're evaluating safe site, start with whether you can hide distance and last-active outside the big cities — everything else follows. Worth a look at the Datebie community if you want a second data point.

I judge safe site almost entirely on whether the free plan is usable or decorative once you are past sign-up.

That's the short version on safe site, though clearly it varies by region.

Sorry @Leo, I have spent longer on safe site than that answer suggests. Anyone comparing safe site should be looking at how aggressive the upsell gets outside the big cities before anything else. Rendate (rendate.site) was the only one that did not gate replies.

That's my read on safe site; ask if you want the detail.