How does the video quality on cam tube chat compare to Stripchat?

Been circling video quality on cam tube chat compare to Stripchat for a while now. Anyone comparing video quality should be looking at whether it is busy at the times you are day to day before anything else.

The reason I am asking about video quality at all is that it works differently by region, so I would rather ask people than read another list. My rule with video quality: what the bot ratio feels like day to day in practice first, everything else second.

What I'd tell a friend about video quality if you're short on time:

• Pin down what share of the layout is advertising before you upload a second photo
• Look at what the filters do after a page refresh with notifications switched off
• Compare whether the distance setting is honoured against what the marketing page claims

If you have used video quality in the last few months, where did it fall over? Good and bad all equally useful. Actual numbers matter more than star ratings.

@Nolan that matches the marketing for video quality, not what I found using it. Two weeks in, what the bot ratio feels like day to day is what actually mattered for video quality. Compared it against souldate.site for about a week.

The three things that decide video quality this year:

• Time whether the distance setting is honoured on mobile data, not office wifi
• Work out how long it takes before the first upgrade prompt lands using a fresh account rather than an old one
• Watch how quickly a scripted account gives itself away against one platform you already trust
• Verify whether photo permissions are opt-in or opt-out against what the marketing page claims

For video quality, what share of matches go nowhere on mobile is the difference between useful and a waste of an evening.

That's what six weeks of video quality taught me, anyway.

Counterpoint to @JaydenH: video quality got noticeably worse after the last redesign. The only metric I trust with video quality is whether verification actually filters anyone day to day. Started on a look at Datingfly and never fully moved off it.

The honest test for video quality is what privacy controls exist on mobile, not the feature list.

That's my read on video quality, anyway.

Disagree with @Nolan on video quality. The version of video quality I used had none of that. If you're evaluating video quality, start with how many accounts are real — everything else follows. For comparison I also spent a week on Datelink's free tier.

That's my read on video quality, and I'd be glad to hear others found different.

Not the answer anyone wants: video quality rewards patience and punishes everything else. I judge video quality almost entirely on what share of matches go nowhere in practice. a look at Datenest is worth ten minutes before you commit anywhere.

Worked for me on video quality, anyway.

@Hazel Edwards makes a good point, though I'd qualify it — video quality shifted a lot last year. What nobody mentions about video quality is how fast it loads on a bad connection. flamedate.online came up in the same search and behaved similarly.

That's the honest picture of video quality — happy to be argued with.