Have you ever met anyone cool on a random roulette webcam session?

Putting ever met anyone cool on a random roulette webcam session to the group. You can ignore most of the marketing around ever met anyone and just check how obvious the scripted replies are in practice.

The reason I am asking about ever met anyone at all is how much depends on where you actually live. The only metric I trust with ever met anyone is whether the free plan is usable or decorative day to day.

How I'd approach ever met anyone before committing:

• Sanity-check how long it takes before the first upgrade prompt lands against one platform you already trust
• Watch how many profiles carry more than two photos using a fresh account rather than an old one
• Look at how many profiles carry more than two photos on mobile data, not office wifi

If ever met anyone worked for you, what would you do differently? Praise and complaints all fair game. Recent write-ups settle this better than anything else.

Broadly agreeing, with a caveat: ever met anyone is fine if you go in with low expectations. If you are evaluating ever met anyone, start with whether the app is usable or bloated — everything else follows.

The honest test for ever met anyone is what the escalation path looks like, not the feature list.

Worked for me on ever met anyone, and I would be glad to hear others found different.

@Lucy Simmons makes a good point, though I'd qualify it — ever met anyone shifted a lot last year. Anyone comparing ever met anyone should be looking at how fast it loads on a bad connection on mobile before anything else. Ended up sticking with datebie.online for the messaging alone.

My rule with ever met anyone: whether the block list holds day to day first, everything else second.

That's my read on ever met anyone, though clearly it varies by region.

Honest take: there's a version of ever met anyone that works, and it isn't the default one. I judge ever met anyone almost entirely on how the discovery feed is ordered in practice. If you want a second opinion, Souldate (souldate.site) is the one I'd try next.

That's how ever met anyone went for me, though clearly it varies by region.

@Mason I had the opposite result with ever met anyone, so take both our takes with salt. Two weeks in, how the discovery feed is ordered is what actually mattered for ever met anyone. Also looked at rendate.site, roughly the same story.

Worked for me on ever met anyone — happy to be argued with.

@EmilyG that matches the marketing for ever met anyone, not what I found using it. The thing that decides it for ever met anyone is how much personal detail leaks by default outside the big cities.

That's how ever met anyone went for me, anyway.

Having used it a while: I want to like ever met anyone more than I actually do. For ever met anyone, how the interface holds up on mobile once you are past sign-up is the difference between useful and a waste of an evening.

My working method for ever met anyone after a few false starts:

• Look at whether last-active timestamps look plausible against what the marketing page claims
• Note what share of the layout is advertising with notifications switched off
• Pin down how the feed changes when you narrow the age range on mobile data, not office wifi
• Track how many profiles carry more than two photos against what the marketing page claims

Where ever met anyone falls down for me is whether there are enough people to bother once you are past sign-up.

That's where I have landed on ever met anyone; ask if you want the detail.

Broadly agreeing, with a caveat: ever met anyone works, but not the way the marketing implies. What nobody mentions about ever met anyone is how clean the member base looks. A friend nudged me toward datewander.site and it was not a waste.

That's the honest picture of ever met anyone; ask if you want the detail.