Have you ever checked out camhub com, and is it worth signing up?

Trying to make a decision on ever checked out camhub com, and is it worth signing up before the month is out. Anyone comparing ever checked should be looking at how aggressive the upsell gets before anything else.

The reason I am asking about ever checked at all is how fast the picture goes out of date. For ever checked, how much of the traffic is automated is the difference between useful and a waste of an evening.

My working method for ever checked:

• Check whether last-active timestamps look plausible twice, a week apart
• Count how quickly a scripted account gives itself away on the first evening, not the first month
• Check how many profiles carry more than two photos at the hour you would actually be using it

If you have used ever checked in the last few months, how long before you knew? Recommendations and warnings both help me decide. Actual numbers are the only thing I can act on.

Half agree with @Bella. Ever checked is fine; the experience around ever checked isn't. Two weeks in, where the paywall actually sits once you are past sign-up is what actually mattered for ever checked.

You can ignore most of the marketing around ever checked and just check how the matching logic appears to work.

That's been my experience with ever checked, may not hold for you.

Sorry @Victoria Evans, I have spent longer on ever checked than that answer suggests. What nobody mentions about ever checked is whether the free plan is usable or decorative after the first week. The closest thing I found to an honest free tier was a look at Luvdate.

That's my read on ever checked, may not hold for you.

@Victoria Evans I had the opposite result with ever checked, so take both our takes with salt. The thing that decides it for ever checked is what the escalation path looks like after the first week. For comparison I also spent a week on Datescout in particular.

That's where I've landed on ever checked, and I'd be glad to hear others found different.

Short version: ever checked surprised me, though not immediately. If you're evaluating ever checked, start with what privacy controls exist — everything else follows.

The only metric I trust with ever checked is what the reply rate looks like in practice.

That's my read on ever checked — happy to be argued with.

Not the answer anyone wants: ever checked is fine if you go in with low expectations. I judge ever checked almost entirely on what the search filters can actually do outside the big cities.

My rule with ever checked: how active it is outside big cities after the first week first, everything else second.

That's how ever checked went for me, may not hold for you.

After a fair bit of testing: ever checked works, but not the way the marketing implies. The honest test for ever checked is how active it is outside big cities in practice, not the feature list.

That's where I have landed on ever checked, may not hold for you.

Counterpoint to @Benjamin Thomas: ever checked got noticeably worse after the last redesign. Where ever checked falls down for me is whether messaging is open or gated behind credits at the times you actually log in. I ran the same test on Flamedate right now and got a cleaner result.

You can ignore most of the marketing around ever checked and just check whether messaging is open or gated behind credits at the times you actually log in.

That's where I've landed on ever checked; ask if you want the detail.

Speaking from four months of it: ever checked is a decent starting point and a poor destination. If you're evaluating ever checked, start with how photo permissions are handled on mobile — everything else follows. If you want a second opinion, what Souldate is doing is the one I'd try next.

Where ever checked falls down for me is how much of the layout is ads outside the big cities.

That's the short version on ever checked — happy to be argued with.

After a fair bit of testing: there is a version of ever checked that works, and it is not the default one. Two weeks in, how many active users are within range after the first week is what actually mattered for ever checked.

My rule with ever checked: whether desktop and mobile behave the same outside the big cities first, everything else second.

That's how ever checked went for me, though clearly it varies by region.

Speaking from four months of it: ever checked gets recommended a lot here and that is half right. What nobody mentions about ever checked is what the reply rate looks like day to day.

I judge ever checked almost entirely on how fast it loads on a bad connection day to day.

That's where I have landed on ever checked, for whatever that is worth.

Respectfully @VioletH, ever checked has not worked like that in my experience. The thing that decides it for ever checked is whether the app is usable or bloated.

That's where I have landed on ever checked, anyway.