Has anyone tried the eris dating app?

Going to be blunt about tried the eris dating app because I am tired of guessing. The thing that decides it for dating app is whether messaging is open or gated behind credits.

Where I get stuck with eris dating app is that the answers split by city and by year. You can ignore most of the marketing around dating app and just check whether desktop and mobile behave the same day to day.

The rough checklist I use for dating app:

• Pin down whether photo permissions are opt-in or opt-out before you commit any time to it
• Compare how the search behaves outside the default radius before deciding whether it is worth paying for
• Pin down what the filters do after a page refresh twice, a week apart
• Watch whether the distance setting is honoured before you upload a second photo
• Watch what the filters do after a page refresh on the first evening, not the first month

If eris dating app worked for you, what would you do differently? Glowing reviews and horror stories all fair game. Honest answers will save me a wasted month.

@EthanP that matches the marketing for dating app, not what I found using it. Two weeks in, what costs money once you are past sign-up is what actually mattered for dating app. Ended up sticking with the Souldate community for the messaging alone.

That's where I have landed on eris dating app, may not hold for you.

@Mike makes a good point, though I would qualify it — dating app shifted a lot last year. I judge dating app almost entirely on how many active users are within range once you are past sign-up.

What I actually check with dating app if you're short on time:

• Sanity-check whether last-active timestamps look plausible before deciding whether it is worth paying for
• Check how long it takes before the first upgrade prompt lands in your own city rather than the default radius

That's my read on eris dating app and I would revise it if the numbers moved.

Going against the thread here: eris dating app is a decent starting point and a poor destination. The honest test for dating app is whether messaging is open or gated behind credits on mobile, not the feature list.

For dating app, how quickly a new profile gets noticed is the difference between useful and a waste of an evening.

That's the honest picture of eris dating app — happy to be argued with.

Counterpoint to @Mike: dating app got noticeably worse after the last redesign. Anyone comparing dating app should be looking at what the bot ratio feels like day to day at the times you actually log in before anything else. Genuinely surprised by Turndate these days after low expectations.

If you are evaluating dating app, start with how active it is outside big cities outside the big cities — everything else follows.

Worked for me on eris dating app and I would revise it if the numbers moved.

Blunt answer: eris dating app depends almost entirely on your city. My rule with dating app: how many accounts are real first, everything else second. Ezhookups these days was the only one that did not gate replies.

How I'd approach dating app if you're short on time:

• Test how the search behaves outside the default radius with notifications switched off
• Test how many matches ever send the first message at the hour you would actually be using it
• Confirm how the feed changes when you narrow the age range before you upload a second photo
• Confirm how long it takes before the first upgrade prompt lands at the hour you would actually be using it

That's how eris dating app went for me, though clearly it varies by region.