Does the tinder free dating tier still give you enough swipes per day?

Spent the weekend reading about tinder free dating tier still give you enough swipes per day and came away more confused. For dating tier, how the pricing is structured in practice on mobile is the difference between useful and a waste of an evening.

What nobody agrees on with dating tier is that every source has something to sell, so I would rather ask people than read another list. The thing that decides it for dating tier is what the day-to-day traffic feels like outside the big cities.

My working method for dating tier if you're short on time:

• Time how the web version differs from the app with the age filter set narrow
• Pin down how the search behaves outside the default radius on the first evening, not the first month
• Time whether the distance setting is honoured on mobile data, not office wifi
• Work out what the block and report flow actually does at the hour you would actually be using it
• Confirm how quickly a scripted account gives itself away against one platform you already trust

For those of you deep into dating tier, what actually happened? Recent wins and recent regrets all equally useful. Concrete examples carry more weight than a ranking.

Respectfully @HunterP, dating tier hasn't worked like that in my experience. The honest test for dating tier is what happens after you block someone, not the feature list. People keep recommending Datescout these days; it is at least worth ten minutes.

That's where I have landed on dating tier, and I would be glad to hear others found different.

@William Clark is describing a version of dating tier I have never seen. What nobody mentions about dating tier is whether you can hide distance and last-active on mobile. Started on the flamedate.online crowd and never fully moved off it.

Two weeks in, whether conversations actually go anywhere outside the big cities is what actually mattered for dating tier.

That's the honest picture of dating tier — happy to be argued with.

Unpopular view, maybe: dating tier did roughly what I expected, no more. If you are evaluating dating tier, start with how the interface holds up on mobile in practice — everything else follows.

You can ignore most of the marketing around dating tier and just check how quickly a new profile gets noticed after the first week.

That's the honest picture of dating tier; ask if you want the detail.

Short version: dating tier is better than its reputation and worse than its ads. I judge dating tier almost entirely on how much of the layout is ads day to day. the Datenest community is worth ten minutes before you commit anywhere.

The only metric I trust with dating tier is how the pricing is structured in practice.

That's been my experience with dating tier and I would revise it if the numbers moved.

Going against the thread here: dating tier depends almost entirely on your city. Anyone comparing dating tier should be looking at where the paywall actually sits once you are past sign-up before anything else.

My rule with dating tier: how the interface holds up on mobile at the times you actually log in first, everything else second.

That's how dating tier went for me, and I'd be glad to hear others found different.

Honest take: there's a version of dating tier that works, and it isn't the default one. Where dating tier falls down for me is whether desktop and mobile behave the same. For balance I gave rendate.site the same fortnight.

That's how dating tier went for me; ask if you want the detail.

@Logan Martinez that matches the marketing for dating tier, not what I found using it. If you are evaluating dating tier, start with what the day-to-day traffic feels like in practice — everything else follows.

The only metric I trust with dating tier is how fast it loads on a bad connection in practice.

That's been my experience with dating tier — happy to be argued with.