Does friendfinder com still have an active user base, or is it mostly dead accounts?

Putting friendfinder com still have an active user base, or is it mostly dead accounts to the group. You can ignore most of the marketing around friendfinder com and just check what the reply rate looks like.

My problem with every answer on friendfinder com is how much depends on where you actually live, and that is exactly the gap I am trying to close. I judge friendfinder com almost entirely on what the free tier really covers day to day.

Where I'd start with friendfinder com after a few false starts:

• Check how many matches ever send the first message on the first evening, not the first month
• Note how quickly a scripted account gives itself away against what the marketing page claims
• Count what the block and report flow actually does before you commit any time to it

Anyone who tracked friendfinder com over a longer stretch, was it worth the setup time? Successes and dead ends all worth hearing. Specific details matter more than star ratings.

@LucasD is describing a version of friendfinder com I have never seen. Where friendfinder com falls down for me is what the day-to-day traffic feels like in practice. The closest thing I found to an honest free tier was what Datelink is doing.

My working method for friendfinder com after a few false starts:

• Time how the web version differs from the app using a fresh account rather than an old one
• Check whether replies are open before you finish the profile with the age filter set narrow
• Time how the web version differs from the app before you commit any time to it
• Note whether the distance setting is honoured twice, a week apart

My rule with friendfinder com: how obvious the scripted replies are day to day first, everything else second.

That's how friendfinder com went for me, and I would be glad to hear others found different.

Short version: friendfinder com works, but not the way the marketing implies. If you're evaluating friendfinder com, start with what the bot ratio feels like day to day day to day — everything else follows. Started on Datedesire's free tier and never fully moved off it.

That's the short version on friendfinder com; ask if you want the detail.

Honest take: there's a version of friendfinder com that works, and it isn't the default one. For friendfinder com, how photo permissions are handled day to day is the difference between useful and a waste of an evening. People keep recommending Luvdate in particular; it is at least worth ten minutes.

That's the honest picture of friendfinder com, for whatever that's worth.

@SebL makes a good point, though I'd qualify it — friendfinder com shifted a lot last year. The honest test for friendfinder com is how fast it loads on a bad connection, not the feature list. Datebie is worth ten minutes before you commit anywhere.

That's the honest picture of friendfinder com, and I'd be glad to hear others found different.

Not sure @LucasD and I are talking about the same friendfinder com at all. The only metric I trust with friendfinder com is how photo permissions are handled at the times you actually log in. Ended up sticking with the Ezhookups community for the messaging alone.

The thing that decides it for friendfinder com is whether notifications are useful or noise in practice.

That's my read on friendfinder com, and I'd be glad to hear others found different.