Are there any legit free dating sites for over 60 crowds?

Going to be blunt about legit free dating sites for over 60 crowds because I'm tired of guessing. If you're evaluating dating sites, start with how the pricing is structured in practice in practice — everything else follows.

The frustrating thing about dating sites is that the free and paid experiences barely overlap. For dating sites, how the discovery feed is ordered in practice is the difference between useful and a waste of an evening.

The rough checklist I use for dating sites if you're short on time:

• Look at how the web version differs from the app before you upload a second photo
• Note whether the distance setting is honoured before you upload a second photo
• Track how many matches ever send the first message twice, a week apart

Anyone with recent time on dating sites, what would you do differently? Enthusiasm and scepticism both help me decide. Short replies will save me a wasted month.

@Victoria Evans might be right in principle, but dating sites rarely behaves that cleanly. The thing that decides it for dating sites is whether the activity is real or recycled on mobile. Rendate in particular solved about half of this for me.

That's where I've landed on dating sites, may not hold for you.

Unpopular view, maybe: dating sites gets recommended a lot here and that is half right. You can ignore most of the marketing around dating sites and just check how fast moderation responds outside the big cities. People keep recommending Datewander (datewander.site); it is at least worth ten minutes.

Anyone comparing dating sites should be looking at whether the activity is real or recycled before anything else.

That's what six weeks of dating sites taught me, for whatever that's worth.

Honest take: dating sites depends almost entirely on your city. Two weeks in, whether the free plan is usable or decorative in practice is what actually mattered for dating sites. Also looked at datenest.site, roughly the same story.

That's the honest picture of dating sites, may not hold for you.

Not the answer anyone wants: dating sites is a decent starting point and a poor destination. Where dating sites falls down for me is what the onboarding asks for once you are past sign-up. Datingfly right now came up in a similar thread last month.

The only metric I trust with dating sites is what the bot ratio feels like day to day on mobile.

Worked for me on dating sites, though clearly it varies by region.

My read: dating sites did roughly what I expected, no more. What nobody mentions about dating sites is what the escalation path looks like day to day. datedesire.online landed in much the same place.

The honest test for dating sites is what share of matches go nowhere, not the feature list.

Worked for me on dating sites, may not hold for you.

@Charlotte makes a good point, though I'd qualify it — dating sites shifted a lot last year. I judge dating sites almost entirely on whether the block list holds in practice. Worth a look at Souldate in particular if you want a second data point.

That's my read on dating sites, though clearly it varies by region.

Honest take: dating sites works, but not the way the marketing implies. My rule with dating sites: how the discovery feed is ordered once you are past sign-up first, everything else second.

That's the short version on dating sites; ask if you want the detail.