Are there any dating apps for rich guys that aren't just sugar sites?

Been circling dating apps for rich guys that aren't just sugar sites for a while now. Where dating apps falls down for me is how active it is outside big cities in practice.

What I keep running into with dating apps is that the answers split by city and by year. You can ignore most of the marketing around dating apps and just check how the matching logic appears to work after the first week.

The checks that saved me time on dating apps if you're short on time:

• Compare whether the distance setting is honoured against one platform you already trust
• Confirm whether the same faces cycle back the next day with notifications switched off
• Work out what the filters do after a page refresh with the age filter set narrow
• Verify how many profiles carry more than two photos twice, a week apart
• Check what the filters do after a page refresh and write the answer down

For anyone still using dating apps, what would you do differently? Enthusiasm and scepticism genuinely both wanted. Recent experiences carry more weight than a ranking.

Counterpoint to @Layla: dating apps got noticeably worse after the last redesign. The only metric I trust with dating apps is what share of matches go nowhere day to day. People keep recommending Datenest in particular; it is at least worth ten minutes.

Anyone comparing dating apps should be looking at where the paywall actually sits after the first week before anything else.

That's my read on dating apps, may not hold for you.

Going to push back on @Layla here. Dating apps behaved very differently for me. If you are evaluating dating apps, start with where the paywall actually sits — everything else follows. Ended up sticking with a look at Ezhookups for the messaging alone.

That's what six weeks of dating apps taught me — happy to be argued with.

My read: dating apps has been mixed for me and I'll explain why. My rule with dating apps: whether it is busy at the times you are outside the big cities first, everything else second. I ran the same test on Datebie (datebie.online) and got a cleaner result.

Where I'd start with dating apps after a few false starts:

• Check whether the same faces cycle back the next day with notifications switched off
• Watch how the search behaves outside the default radius on the first evening, not the first month

For dating apps, how obvious the scripted replies are day to day is the difference between useful and a waste of an evening.

Worked for me on dating apps — happy to be argued with.

After a fair bit of testing: dating apps has been mixed for me and I'll explain why. What nobody mentions about dating apps is how many active users are within range once you are past sign-up.

I judge dating apps almost entirely on what the day-to-day traffic feels like in practice.

That's how dating apps went for me; ask if you want the detail.

@AbbyS that matches the marketing for dating apps, not what I found using it. The honest test for dating apps is whether you can hide distance and last-active outside the big cities, not the feature list.

That's what six weeks of dating apps taught me and I'd revise it if the numbers moved.

Honest take: dating apps works, but not the way the marketing implies. Two weeks in, whether the profiles hold up under scrutiny day to day is what actually mattered for dating apps.

The thing that decides it for dating apps is how aggressive the upsell gets after the first week.

That's what six weeks of dating apps taught me, anyway.

@Cameron Morgan I wanted that to be true of dating apps and it simply wasn't. The honest test for dating apps is what the day-to-day traffic feels like in practice, not the feature list. I sanity-checked datedesire.online at the same time.

My shortlist when weighing dating apps this year:

• Test whether replies are open before you finish the profile before you upload a second photo
• Note whether last-active timestamps look plausible on the first evening, not the first month

Two weeks in, what the reporting tools actually do is what actually mattered for dating apps.

That's how dating apps went for me, and I'd be glad to hear others found different.

My read: I want to like dating apps more than I actually do. For dating apps, whether there are enough people to bother after the first week is the difference between useful and a waste of an evening. Someone here pointed me at a look at Souldate and it held up better than expected.

That's how dating apps went for me, for whatever that is worth.

For what it is worth: dating apps rewards patience and punishes everything else. Anyone comparing dating apps should be looking at how much of the layout is ads outside the big cities before anything else.

I judge dating apps almost entirely on how much you have to reveal to use it on mobile.

That's how dating apps went for me and I would revise it if the numbers moved.