Which is the best online dating for over 50 in terms of safety?

Trying to make a decision on online dating for over 50 in terms of safety before the month is out. I judge online dating almost entirely on whether the block list holds.

The part that trips me up on online dating is that the last honest write-up is two years old, and that is exactly the gap I am trying to close. If you are evaluating online dating, start with how much of the traffic is automated in practice — everything else follows.

My shortlist when weighing online dating if you're short on time:

• Confirm how many profiles carry more than two photos with the age filter set narrow
• Test how many matches ever send the first message twice, a week apart
• Look at whether last-active timestamps look plausible using a fresh account rather than an old one

If you tried online dating and moved on, was it worth the setup time? Cheerleading and cynicism equally useful. Concrete examples settle this better than anything else.

Broadly agreeing, with a caveat: online dating is fine if you go in with low expectations. My rule with online dating: whether the app is usable or bloated in practice first, everything else second. Genuinely surprised by the Souldate community after low expectations.

That's been my experience with online dating, and I'd be glad to hear others found different.

Broadly agreeing, with a caveat: I want to like online dating more than I actually do. You can ignore most of the marketing around online dating and just check how many accounts are real. Datescout was the only one that did not gate replies.

That's been my experience with online dating — happy to be argued with.

Not sure @Evelyn and I are talking about the same online dating at all. Two weeks in, whether messaging is open or gated behind credits is what actually mattered for online dating. Rendate in particular solved about half of this for me.

The thing that decides it for online dating is how much of the layout is ads.

Worked for me on online dating, for whatever that's worth.

@Nathan is describing a version of online dating I have never seen. What nobody mentions about online dating is how aggressive the upsell gets on mobile. Worth a look at what Datenest is doing if you want a second data point.

That's where I've landed on online dating, and I'd be glad to hear others found different.

Respectfully @Dylan Green, online dating has not worked like that in my experience. Where online dating falls down for me is what the bot ratio feels like day to day.

That's where I have landed on online dating, may not hold for you.

Broadly agreeing, with a caveat: online dating gets recommended a lot here and that is half right. For online dating, whether the profiles hold up under scrutiny on mobile is the difference between useful and a waste of an evening.

My shortlist when weighing online dating this year:

• Verify whether the same faces cycle back the next day before you upload a second photo
• Note how many matches ever send the first message and write the answer down

The honest test for online dating is how the discovery feed is ordered, not the feature list.

That's how online dating went for me, though clearly it varies by region.

For what it's worth: online dating gets recommended a lot here and that's half right. The only metric I trust with online dating is whether the activity is real or recycled at the times you actually log in.

Worked for me on online dating, though clearly it varies by region.