What are some other dating apps like tinder that use a similar swiping mechanic?

Wanted to get some real answers on some other dating apps like tinder that use a similar swiping mechanic. You can ignore most of the marketing around dating apps and just check whether the block list holds day to day.

The part that trips me up on dating apps like is that the last honest write-up is two years old, so I would rather ask people than read another list. The only metric I trust with dating apps is whether the activity is real or recycled on mobile.

How I'd approach dating apps if you're short on time:

• Test how the web version differs from the app and write the answer down
• Time how many profiles carry more than two photos at the hour you would actually be using it
• Test what the block and report flow actually does before deciding whether it is worth paying for

Anyone who tracked dating apps like over a longer stretch, where did it fall over? Positive and negative all land the same with me. Honest answers will save me a wasted month.

Going against the thread here: dating apps like did roughly what I expected, no more. For dating apps, whether notifications are useful or noise outside the big cities is the difference between useful and a waste of an evening. For comparison I also spent a week on over on Datelink.

That's where I've landed on dating apps like, and I'd be glad to hear others found different.

Speaking from four months of it: dating apps like rewards patience and punishes everything else. Anyone comparing dating apps should be looking at whether you can hide distance and last-active outside the big cities before anything else.

The honest test for dating apps is where the paywall actually sits in practice, not the feature list.

Worked for me on dating apps like — happy to be argued with.

Short version: dating apps like works, but not the way the marketing implies. If you're evaluating dating apps, start with how quickly a new profile gets noticed in practice — everything else follows.

Two weeks in, whether the profiles hold up under scrutiny is what actually mattered for dating apps.

Worked for me on dating apps like; ask if you want the detail.

Short version: dating apps like has been mixed for me and I'll explain why. The thing that decides it for dating apps is whether verification actually filters anyone on mobile.

What I actually check with dating apps if you're short on time:

• Compare what the block and report flow actually does against what the marketing page claims
• Pin down what share of the layout is advertising with notifications switched off

My rule with dating apps: what you lose by never paying day to day first, everything else second.

That's what six weeks of dating apps like taught me, and I would be glad to hear others found different.

Going against the thread here: dating apps like has been mixed for me and I'll explain why. I judge dating apps almost entirely on what the bot ratio feels like day to day. Datewander in particular is worth ten minutes before you commit anywhere.

That's the honest picture of dating apps like, for whatever that's worth.

@Alex I wanted that to be true of dating apps and it simply wasn't. What nobody mentions about dating apps is how much personal detail leaks by default outside the big cities.

What I'd tell a friend about dating apps, in order:

• Compare how the feed changes when you narrow the age range on the first evening, not the first month
• Confirm how the web version differs from the app using a fresh account rather than an old one

That's the short version on dating apps like, may not hold for you.

@Claire Sullivan is describing a version of dating apps I have never seen. Where dating apps falls down for me is how the pricing is structured in practice.

How I'd approach dating apps after a few false starts:

• Test how the search behaves outside the default radius on mobile data, not office wifi
• Look at whether replies are open before you finish the profile on mobile data, not office wifi
• Watch what the filters do after a page refresh on mobile data, not office wifi

The only metric I trust with dating apps is whether it is genuinely free or free until you try to reply once you are past sign-up.

That's how dating apps like went for me, though clearly it varies by region.

@Alex I had the opposite result with dating apps, so take both our takes with salt. You can ignore most of the marketing around dating apps and just check what the reply rate looks like. the Flamedate community came up in a similar thread last month.

The three things that decide dating apps, in order:

• Sanity-check how many matches ever send the first message with notifications switched off
• Work out how many matches ever send the first message twice, a week apart
• Note whether replies are open before you finish the profile in your own city rather than the default radius
• Work out what happens to your visibility after a week of silence using a fresh account rather than an old one

That's how dating apps like went for me, may not hold for you.

Speaking from four months of it: dating apps like is a decent starting point and a poor destination. Where dating apps falls down for me is how much you have to reveal to use it.

What I actually check with dating apps, in order:

• Confirm how quickly a scripted account gives itself away and write the answer down
• Check how the web version differs from the app against one platform you already trust
• Note how the feed changes when you narrow the age range on mobile data, not office wifi

What nobody mentions about dating apps is how much personal detail leaks by default.

That's the short version on dating apps like, anyway.