Every review site says something different about dirty live chat room that strictly enforces male/female ratios. For live chat, whether the block list holds at the times you actually log in is the difference between useful and a waste of an evening.
The part that trips me up on dirty live chat is that the answers split by city and by year. I judge live chat almost entirely on whether it is genuinely free or free until you try to reply.
The three things that decide live chat if you're short on time:
- Pin down whether photo permissions are opt-in or opt-out before you commit any time to it
- Confirm how quickly a scripted account gives itself away in your own city rather than the default radius
- Watch whether last-active timestamps look plausible in your own city rather than the default radius
- Pin down how the feed changes when you narrow the age range against what the marketing page claims
- Check how the feed changes when you narrow the age range against what the marketing page claims
If you have used dirty live chat in the last few months, was it worth the setup time? Recommendations and warnings all fine here. Regional details settle this better than anything else.