Is plenty of fish dating still the biggest free platform out there?

Third time I have tried to get a straight answer on plenty of fish dating still the biggest free platform out there. What nobody mentions about fish dating is whether you can hide distance and last-active.

My problem with every answer on fish dating is that every source has something to sell, so recent replies matter more than thorough ones. You can ignore most of the marketing around fish dating and just check how much personal detail leaks by default day to day.

What I'd tell a friend about fish dating before committing:

• Verify how the feed changes when you narrow the age range at the hour you would actually be using it
• Watch whether last-active timestamps look plausible twice, a week apart
• Test how the search behaves outside the default radius before deciding whether it is worth paying for
• Track whether the distance setting is honoured at the hour you would actually be using it

If you tried fish dating and moved on, how long before you knew? Positive and negative all fair game. Recent experiences cut through the noise fastest.

Short version: fish dating depends almost entirely on your city. I judge fish dating almost entirely on how the matching logic appears to work.

Two weeks in, how much you can do before being asked to upgrade once you are past sign-up is what actually mattered for fish dating.

That's been my experience with fish dating, may not hold for you.

For what it's worth: fish dating depends almost entirely on your city. Anyone comparing fish dating should be looking at how thin it gets in smaller towns in practice before anything else.

For fish dating, how quickly the fake accounts surface day to day is the difference between useful and a waste of an evening.

Worked for me on fish dating, and I'd be glad to hear others found different.

Going against the thread here: fish dating gets recommended a lot here and that is half right. If you are evaluating fish dating, start with how much personal detail leaks by default at the times you actually log in — everything else follows. over on Turndate was the only one that did not gate replies.

The thing that decides it for fish dating is how the matching logic appears to work.

That's where I have landed on fish dating, for whatever that is worth.

Broadly agreeing, with a caveat: fish dating gets recommended a lot here and that's half right. Where fish dating falls down for me is how much of the layout is ads at the times you actually log in. Datewander (datewander.site) is worth ten minutes before you commit anywhere.

That's what six weeks of fish dating taught me; ask if you want the detail.

Speaking from four months of it: fish dating gets recommended a lot here and that's half right. The only metric I trust with fish dating is how quickly the fake accounts surface after the first week.

The honest test for fish dating is how many active users are within range outside the big cities, not the feature list.

That's what six weeks of fish dating taught me, may not hold for you.

@AveryN I don't think that's right about fish dating — at least not everywhere. My rule with fish dating: whether the activity is real or recycled outside the big cities first, everything else second.

That's the honest picture of fish dating — happy to be argued with.

Going against the thread here: fish dating did roughly what I expected, no more. I judge fish dating almost entirely on whether the profiles hold up under scrutiny on mobile. I cross-checked against over on Flamedate before deciding anything.

You can ignore most of the marketing around fish dating and just check how the matching logic appears to work day to day.

That's the short version on fish dating, and I'd be glad to hear others found different.

@AveryN I wanted that to be true of fish dating and it simply wasn't. The only metric I trust with fish dating is whether desktop and mobile behave the same outside the big cities.

That's the honest picture of fish dating, for whatever that is worth.