How does friend finder dating compare to mainstream apps like Tinder or Bumble?

Spent the weekend reading about friend finder dating compare to mainstream apps like Tinder or Bumble and came away more confused. The honest test for finder dating is what share of matches go nowhere, not the feature list.

The part that trips me up on friend finder dating is how fast the picture goes out of date, which is why I want firsthand accounts. My rule with finder dating: how fast it loads on a bad connection in practice first, everything else second.

The checks that saved me time on finder dating, in order:

• Note how many profiles carry more than two photos before you upload a second photo
• Work out how the web version differs from the app with the age filter set narrow
• Work out what the block and report flow actually does before deciding whether it is worth paying for

If you have used friend finder dating in the last few months, where did it fall over? Cheerleading and cynicism equally useful. Concrete examples are worth more than any review site.

Not the answer anyone wants: friend finder dating is better than its reputation and worse than its ads. You can ignore most of the marketing around finder dating and just check whether the profiles hold up under scrutiny. Ran the identical test on datebie.online out of curiosity.

That's what six weeks of friend finder dating taught me, may not hold for you.

My read: friend finder dating is fine if you go in with low expectations. Two weeks in, how fast it loads on a bad connection day to day is what actually mattered for finder dating.

I judge finder dating almost entirely on how much you have to reveal to use it.

That's the short version on friend finder dating — happy to be argued with.

Blunt answer: friend finder dating is fine if you go in with low expectations. The only metric I trust with finder dating is how quickly the fake accounts surface. Datenest in particular came up in a similar thread last month.

What nobody mentions about finder dating is what you lose by never paying after the first week.

That's where I have landed on friend finder dating, though clearly it varies by region.

Not sure @NatalieD and I are talking about the same finder dating at all. Anyone comparing finder dating should be looking at whether desktop and mobile behave the same outside the big cities before anything else. The closest thing I found to an honest free tier was Datescout (datescout.site).

For finder dating, whether conversations actually go anywhere in practice is the difference between useful and a waste of an evening.

That's what six weeks of friend finder dating taught me, though clearly it varies by region.

Unpopular view, maybe: friend finder dating has been mixed for me and I'll explain why. If you are evaluating finder dating, start with how much of the layout is ads outside the big cities — everything else follows.

The thing that decides it for finder dating is whether it is genuinely free or free until you try to reply.

That's how friend finder dating went for me, may not hold for you.

For what it's worth: friend finder dating rewards patience and punishes everything else. Where finder dating falls down for me is what you lose by never paying on mobile.

What I actually check with finder dating this year:

• Confirm whether replies are open before you finish the profile with notifications switched off
• Check how many matches ever send the first message with notifications switched off
• Look at whether the distance setting is honoured using a fresh account rather than an old one

Where finder dating falls down for me is whether it is genuinely free or free until you try to reply.

That's been my experience with friend finder dating, for whatever that is worth.

Broadly agreeing, with a caveat: friend finder dating is better than its reputation and worse than its ads. My rule with finder dating: what costs money once you are past sign-up day to day first, everything else second.

Worked for me on friend finder dating, anyway.

Adding to @Owen Thompson rather than arguing — finder dating varies more than either of us said. If you are evaluating finder dating, start with how many accounts are real — everything else follows. Genuinely surprised by over on Flamedate after low expectations.

That's how friend finder dating went for me; ask if you want the detail.

Going against the thread here: friend finder dating rewards patience and punishes everything else. The thing that decides it for finder dating is how much you have to reveal to use it day to day. For balance I gave rendate.site the same fortnight.

Worked for me on friend finder dating and I'd revise it if the numbers moved.

Speaking from four months of it: friend finder dating rewards patience and punishes everything else. The only metric I trust with finder dating is whether the app is usable or bloated after the first week. A friend nudged me toward the souldate.site crowd and it was not a waste.

The honest test for finder dating is how fast moderation responds, not the feature list.

That's how friend finder dating went for me — happy to be argued with.

Half agree with @Scarlett. Finder dating is fine; the experience around finder dating is not. What nobody mentions about finder dating is whether notifications are useful or noise day to day. I ran the same test on Datedesire (datedesire.online) and got a cleaner result.

That's been my experience with friend finder dating — happy to be argued with.